Empresas
Empleos
  • Sobre nosotros
  • Soluciones
    • Publicación de vacantes
      Publica tu vacante y recibe candidatos calificados en 48h.
    • Evaluación de candidatos
      500+ pruebas técnicas y psicológicas, más anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Búsqueda ejecutiva a la medida de principio a fin.
    • Nómina + EOR
      Dispersión de nómina y EOR en más de 15 países de LATAM.
  • Precios
  • Empleos

0

100
Vistas
Different results between c++ and c# sin function with large values

I came across such strange behavior of the Math.Sin function in C#, when I use large numbers; for example:

C#: .Net 4.7.2: Math.Sin(6.2831853071795856E+45) = 6.2831853071795856E+45

C++: sin(6.2831853071795856E+45) = -0.089650623841643268

Any ideas how to get the same results as C++?

C# sample:

double value = 6.2831853071795856E+45;    
Console.WriteLine(Math.Sin(value));

C++ sample:

double x = 6.2831853071795856E+45;
double result;
    
result = sin(x);
cout << "sin(x) = " << result << endl;
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
1 Respuestas
Responde la pregunta

0

The sin of large numbers like 6.2831853071795856E+45; makes no sense. Remember that Pi is approximately 3.14 and that your floating numbers are probably IEEE 754 (see the http://floating-point-gui.de/ for more)

The computed number is probably entirely wrong.

Consider using static analysis tools like Fluctuat on your C or C++ code. Or dynamic tools like CADNA

As a rule of thumb, trigonometric functions like sin, cos, tan should not be used with large numbers (e.g. more than a few thousands times PI ℼ = 3.14 in absolute value).

Otherwise, use a bignum library like GMPlib. It will slow down calculations by a factor of thousands, but it could give you meaningful results for sin (pi * 1.e+45)

And please read something about Taylor series (they are related to trigonometric functions)

Try also to use GNUplot to "visualize" the sin function (for reasonable numbers).

Mathematically the sin of every finite real number is between -1 and 1. So Math.Sin(6.2831853071795856E+45) = 6.2831853071795856E+45 is wrong.

Read also conference papers like this one and that one.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Denunciar
Responde la pregunta
Encuentra empleos remotos

¡Descubre la nueva forma de encontrar empleo!

Top de empleos
Top categorías de empleo
Empresas
Publicar vacante Precios Comercial
Legal
Términos y condiciones Política de privacidad
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomiéndame algunas ofertas
Necesito ayuda