Empresas
Empleos
  • Sobre nosotros
  • Soluciones
    • Publicación de vacantes
      Publica tu vacante y recibe candidatos calificados en 48h.
    • Evaluación de candidatos
      500+ pruebas técnicas y psicológicas, más anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Búsqueda ejecutiva a la medida de principio a fin.
    • Nómina + EOR
      Dispersión de nómina y EOR en más de 15 países de LATAM.
  • Precios
  • Empleos

0

225
Vistas
Find the minimum cost combination algorithm

Given an array N which contains at least 5 items, I want to find 2 numbers(P and Q) in which 0 < P < Q < N - 1.

Suppose we have the following array:

const N = [1, 9, 4, 5, 8];
  • if P = 1 , Q = 2 , the cost will be N[P] + N[Q] = N[1] + N[2] = 9 + 4 = 13
  • if P = 1, Q = 3 , the cost will be N[P] + N[Q] = N[1] + N[3] = 9 + 5 = 14
  • if P = 2, Q = 3 , the cost will be N[P] + N[Q] = N[2] + N[3] = 4 + 5 = 9

From here the combination which gives the minimum cost is P = 2 and Q = 3.

Here is the solution that I found and I am looking for your help if I can improve its time complexity:

function solution(N) {
  // since  0 < P < Q < N - 1
  const sliced = N.slice(1, N.length - 1);
  const sorted = sliced.sort((a, b) => a - b);

  // the minimum should be from the start since we have sorted the array
  const P = 0;
  const Q = 1;

  return getCost(P, Q, sorted);
}

function getCost(P, Q, N) {
  return N[P] + N[Q];
}

// output should be 9
console.log(solution([1, 9, 4, 5, 8]))

In a best-case scenario it's 0(n log(n)) because of the sort, but I am wondering if we can improve it to O(n) for example.

Thanks for your help

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
3 Respuestas
Responde la pregunta

0

What do you think of this solution?

function solution([_, ...n]) {
  n.pop()
  n.sort((a, b) => a - b);

  return n[0] + n[1];
}

// output should be 9
console.log(solution([1, 9, 4, 5, 8]))

The logic is the same that you outlined - only using some other approach that JS offers.

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Denunciar

0

function twoSmallest(arr) {
  let [first, second] = [arr[1], arr[2]]
  
  for (let i = 3; i < arr.length - 1; i++) {
    const el = arr[i]
    if (el < first && el < second) {
      [first, second] = [Math.min(first, second), el] 
    } else if (el < first) {
      [first, second] = [second, el]
    } else if (el < second) {
      second = el
    }
  }
  return first + second
}

This is an O(n) time and O(1) space solution. It also makes sure that the element with the smaller index is kept in first for the case where you need to use the indices and it is of interest for some reason.

The algorithm is clear, IMO, but the JS code is probably not the best implementation. I haven't written JS for some time.

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Denunciar

0

I'm pretty sure this is O(n):

const solution = (arr) => {
  // find smallest that's not at either end
  let idx = 1;
  let P = arr[1];
  for(let i = 2; i < arr.length-1; i++) {
    if(arr[i] < P) {
      idx = i;
      P = arr[i];
    }
  }
  // find second smallest that's not at either end
  let Q = Infinity;
  for(let i = 1; i < arr.length-1; i++) {
    if(i == idx) continue;
    if(arr[i] < Q) Q = arr[i];
  }
  return P + Q;
}
about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Denunciar
Responde la pregunta
Encuentra empleos remotos

¡Descubre la nueva forma de encontrar empleo!

Top de empleos
Top categorías de empleo
Empresas
Publicar vacante Precios Comercial
Legal
Términos y condiciones Política de privacidad
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomiéndame algunas ofertas
Necesito ayuda