Empresas
Empleos
  • Sobre nosotros
  • Soluciones
    • Publicación de vacantes
      Publica tu vacante y recibe candidatos calificados en 48h.
    • Evaluación de candidatos
      500+ pruebas técnicas y psicológicas, más anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Búsqueda ejecutiva a la medida de principio a fin.
    • Nómina + EOR
      Dispersión de nómina y EOR en más de 15 países de LATAM.
  • Precios
  • Empleos

0

318
Vistas
Node JS Concurrency Handling Coding Interview Question

I attended a NodeJS coding interview. Got below code which executes asynchronously from different browsers(to be assumed). Our solution needs to lock the execution of function if the update by ID is same but called from different place (say browser). And then release the lock for next request's execution.

Here no changes to be made for the mentioned code below.

async function update(id, data) {
    console.log(`start --> id:${id}, data:${data}`);
    await randomDelay(); //update is happening here
    console.log(`end --> id:${id}, data:${data}`);
}

//=============================================================================
//================= Don't change anything below ===============================
//=============================================================================

//---- update() is getting called from many places ----
update(1, "browser 1");
update(1, "browser 2");

//========================= Utility functions ===================================
//========================= Don't change any here================================

async function sleep(ms) {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
        setTimeout(() => resolve(), ms);
    });
}

async function randomDelay() {
    const randomTime = Math.round(Math.random() * 1000);
    return sleep(randomTime);
}

This will give an output like below.

start --> id:1, data:browser 1
start --> id:1, data:browser 2
end --> id:1, data:browser 1
end --> id:1, data:browser 2

The expected answer is

start --> id:1, data:browser 1
end --> id:1, data:browser 1
start --> id:1, data:browser 2
end --> id:1, data:browser 2

Please note the comments in code "Don't change anything below". What would be the possible solution?

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
2 Respuestas
Responde la pregunta

0

You could use a hash table of queues keyed by ID so only jobs with the same ID run consecutively, otherwise they run concurrently.

let hash = {};
class Queue {
  constructor() {
    this.isBusy = false;
    this.jobs = [];
  }

  push(jobFn) {
    return new Promise((resolve) => {
      this.jobs.push({
        jobFn,
        resolve
      });
      this.next();
    });
  }

  next() {
    if (this.isBusy || this.jobs.length === 0) return;
    this.isBusy = true;
    let currJob = this.jobs.shift();
    return currJob.jobFn().then((data) => {
      currJob.resolve(data);
      this.isBusy = false;
      this.next();
    });
  }
}

async function update(id, data) {
  const updateFn = async () => {
    console.log(`start --> id:${id}, data:${data}`);
    await randomDelay(); //update is happening here
    console.log(`end --> id:${id}, data:${data}`);
  };
  if (id in hash) {
    hash[id].push(updateFn);
  } else {
    hash[id] = new Queue(updateFn);
    hash[id].push(updateFn);
  }
}

//=============================================================================
//================= Don't change anything below ===============================
//=============================================================================

//---- update() is getting called from many places ----
update(1, "browser 1");
update(1, "browser 2");
update(2, "browser 1");
update(2, "browser 2");
update(1, "browser 3");
update(1, "browser 4");

//========================= Utility functions ===================================
//========================= Don't change any here================================

async function sleep(ms) {
  return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    setTimeout(() => resolve(), ms);
  });
}

async function randomDelay() {
  const randomTime = Math.round(Math.random() * 1000);
  return sleep(randomTime);
}

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Denunciar

0

This solution works for just two consecuence calls with different data as you expected, so I am working on extending it but for now, I hope will give you a good vision of how it should be implemented

const callStack = []
async function update(id, data) {
    const stackLen = callStack.length;
    let currentIndex;

    if (stackLen) {
        let currentCall = callStack[stackLen - 1];
        if (currentCall.start == true && currentCall.await == true) {
            setImmediate(() => update(id, data))
            return;
        }
        currentIndex = stackLen - 1;
        if (currentCall.args[0] == id && currentCall.args[1] !== data) {
            
            if (currentCall.await === true) {
                currentCall.start = true;
                update(id, data)
                return;
            }
        }
    } else {
        callStack.push({ args: [...arguments], await: true })
        currentIndex = 0;
    }
    console.log(`start --> id:${id}, data:${data}`);
    await randomDelay(); //update is happening here
    console.log(`end --> id:${id}, data:${data}`);
    callStack[currentIndex].await = false;
}
about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Denunciar
Responde la pregunta
Encuentra empleos remotos

¡Descubre la nueva forma de encontrar empleo!

Top de empleos
Top categorías de empleo
Empresas
Publicar vacante Precios Comercial
Legal
Términos y condiciones Política de privacidad
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomiéndame algunas ofertas
Necesito ayuda