Empresas
Empleos
  • Sobre nosotros
  • Soluciones
    • Publicación de vacantes
      Publica tu vacante y recibe candidatos calificados en 48h.
    • Evaluación de candidatos
      500+ pruebas técnicas y psicológicas, más anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Búsqueda ejecutiva a la medida de principio a fin.
    • Nómina + EOR
      Dispersión de nómina y EOR en más de 15 países de LATAM.
  • Precios
  • Empleos

0

602
Vistas
How to add custom message to Jest expect?

Image following test case:

it('valid emails checks', () => {
  ['abc@y.com', 'a@b.nz'/*, ...*/].map(mail => {
    expect(isValid(mail)).toBe(true);
  });
});

I would like to add auto-generated message for each email like Email 'f@f.com' should be valid so that it's easy to find failing test cases.

Something like:

// .map(email =>
expect(isValid(email), `Email ${email} should be valid`).toBe(true);

Is it possible in Jest ?

In Chai it was possible to do with second parameter like expect(value, 'custom fail message').to.be... and in Jasmine seems like it's done with .because clause. But cannot find solution in Jest.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
3 Respuestas
Responde la pregunta

0

You try this lib that extends jest: https://github.com/mattphillips/jest-expect-message

test('returns 2 when adding 1 and 1', () => {
  expect(1 + 1, 'Woah this should be 2!').toBe(3);
});
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Denunciar

0

I don't think it's possible to provide a message like that. But you could define your own matcher.

For example you could create a toBeValid(validator) matcher:

expect.extend({
  toBeValid(received, validator) {
    if (validator(received)) {
      return {
        message: () => `Email ${received} should NOT be valid`,
        pass: true
      };
    } else {
      return {
        message: () => `Email ${received} should be valid`,
        pass: false
      };
    }
  }
});

And then you use it like this:

expect(mail).toBeValid(isValid);

Note: toBeValid returns a message for both cases (success and failure), because it allows you to use .not. The test will fail with the corresponding message depending on whether you want it to pass the validation.

expect(mail).toBeValid(isValid);
// pass === true: Test passes
// pass === false: Failure: Email ... should be valid

expect(mail).not.toBeValid(isValid);
// pass === true: Failure: Email ... should NOT be valid
// pass === false: Test passes
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Denunciar

0

Although it's not a general solution, for the common case of wanting a custom exception message to distinguish items in a loop, you can instead use Jest's test.each.

For example, your sample code:

it('valid emails checks', () => {
  ['abc@y.com', 'a@b.nz'/*, ...*/].map(mail => {
    expect(isValid(mail)).toBe(true);
  });
});

Could instead become

test.each(
    ['abc@y.com', 'a@b.nz'/*, ...*/],
    'checks that email %s is valid',
    mail => {
        expect(isValid(mail)).toBe(true);
    }
);
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Denunciar
Responde la pregunta
Encuentra empleos remotos

¡Descubre la nueva forma de encontrar empleo!

Top de empleos
Top categorías de empleo
Empresas
Publicar vacante Precios Comercial
Legal
Términos y condiciones Política de privacidad
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomiéndame algunas ofertas
Necesito ayuda