Empresas
Empleos
  • Sobre nosotros
  • Soluciones
    • Publicación de vacantes
      Publica tu vacante y recibe candidatos calificados en 48h.
    • Evaluación de candidatos
      500+ pruebas técnicas y psicológicas, más anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Búsqueda ejecutiva a la medida de principio a fin.
    • Nómina + EOR
      Dispersión de nómina y EOR en más de 15 países de LATAM.
  • Precios
  • Empleos

0

281
Vistas
Typescript inline type declaration for object-member

In the following block of code defined the type of the attribute pens with the <>-Notation:

return {
    ...defaultValues, 
    pens: 
      <[{penStrokeColor: string, penStrokeWidth: number, penOpacity: number}]>
      [...Array(5).keys() ].map((_)=> { 
        return {
          penStrokeColor: defaultValues.currentItemStrokeColor,
          penStrokeWidth: defaultValues.currentItemStrokeWidth,
          penOpacity: defaultValues.currentItemOpacity
        }})
  }

The code above works but my linter is complaining that this type-hint should be declared differently:

Use 'as [{ penStrokeColor: string; penStrokeWidth: number; penOpacity: number }]' instead of '<[{ penStrokeColor: string; penStrokeWidth: number; penOpacity: number }]>'  @typescript-eslint/consistent-type-assertions

Can this be done inline as well and if so, how?

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
1 Respuestas
Responde la pregunta

0

It's just as the error says - use as instead of angle bracket notation to assert the type.

return {
    ...defaultValues, 
    pens: 
      [...Array(5).keys() ].map((_)=> { 
        return {
          penStrokeColor: defaultValues.currentItemStrokeColor,
          penStrokeWidth: defaultValues.currentItemStrokeWidth,
          penOpacity: defaultValues.currentItemOpacity
        }}) as [{penStrokeColor: string, penStrokeWidth: number, penOpacity: number}]
  }

But I don't think that's what you want - do you really want to tell TS that the created array is a tuple, with only a single item? Since you're creating 5 elements, you probably want an array type instead.

There's also no need for type assertion at all if that's the case - TS can properly infer that the created array is of the desired type.

return {
    ...defaultValues, 
    pens: [...Array(5).keys() ].map((_)=> { 
        return {
          penStrokeColor: defaultValues.currentItemStrokeColor,
          penStrokeWidth: defaultValues.currentItemStrokeWidth,
          penOpacity: defaultValues.currentItemOpacity
        };
    })
};

which infers the correct type without any TypeScript syntax at all.

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Denunciar
Responde la pregunta
Encuentra empleos remotos

¡Descubre la nueva forma de encontrar empleo!

Top de empleos
Top categorías de empleo
Empresas
Publicar vacante Precios Comercial
Legal
Términos y condiciones Política de privacidad
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomiéndame algunas ofertas
Necesito ayuda