Empresas
Empleos
  • Sobre nosotros
  • Soluciones
    • Publicación de vacantes
      Publica tu vacante y recibe candidatos calificados en 48h.
    • Evaluación de candidatos
      500+ pruebas técnicas y psicológicas, más anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Búsqueda ejecutiva a la medida de principio a fin.
    • Nómina + EOR
      Dispersión de nómina y EOR en más de 15 países de LATAM.
  • Precios
  • Empleos

0

144
Vistas
Dynamically changing variables type

I am building a factorization program and I would like to change each BigInt type to regular Numbers when number <= Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER.

Instead of coding two functions for each case, it would be nice if I could keep it all into one function which could vary variables types accordingly (something like let myVar = 3n || 3 I guess).

function Factorize(dividend) {
  let divisor = 2n; 
  //if number <= Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER then let divisor = 2. Same for all other bigInts.
  let method1 = [], method2 = [];
  while (dividend > 1n) {
    if (dividend % divisor === 0n) {
      method1.push(`${divisor}`);
      method2.push(`${dividend} / ${divisor}`);
      dividend /= divisor;
    } else {
      divisor++
    };
  };
  return {
    default: method1,
    detailed: method2,
    get isPrime() {
      return this.default.length === 1 && this.default[0] !== 2;
    }
  };
};

const number = parseInt(prompt());

console.log(Factorize(BigInt(number)));

Thanks for your help.

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
1 Respuestas
Responde la pregunta

0

What's the difficulty? Your comment contains half the required code already:

  if (dividend <= Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER) {
    divisor = 2;
    dividend = Number(dividend);
  }

And then you only need to replace the two strict equality comparisons === 0n and !== 2 with their non-strict variants. 0 == 0n returns true, 0n === 0n returns false.

Some other things worth mentioning:

(1) This method for factorization is extremely slow. There are prime numbers well below Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER for which this will take months. Depending on your use case, limiting the input size or implementing some sort of timeout (e.g., returning an error if a certain number of iterations wasn't enough to find the complete result) may be more important than supporting BigInts at all. (For inputs that have only small prime factors, even extremely huge inputs will still terminate quickly, so it's certainly possible to exceed Number range (even Number.MAX_VALUE) while still only taking a few milliseconds.)

(2) Using parseInt to get your input means that you're limiting yourself to Number precision; converting that Number to a BigInt afterwards doesn't bring the lost bits back. For example, if someone enters '12157665459056928801' (which is 3n ** 40n), parseInt will truncate that and your program will hence compute the wrong result. To avoid that, use the fact that the BigInt() constructor can convert strings directly, i.e.: BigInt(prompt()).

(3) While it's sometimes possible to write code that can work on both Numbers and BigInts, doing so is generally not recommended (and often not even useful), because the two types of values (intentionally!) behave differently in a number of ways (otherwise we wouldn't need both of them), so there is a large risk of such code not doing what you think it'll do. In this particular case it should be okay; I'm just advising not to generalize from this example.

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Denunciar
Responde la pregunta
Encuentra empleos remotos

¡Descubre la nueva forma de encontrar empleo!

Top de empleos
Top categorías de empleo
Empresas
Publicar vacante Precios Comercial
Legal
Términos y condiciones Política de privacidad
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomiéndame algunas ofertas
Necesito ayuda