Empresas
Empleos
  • Sobre nosotros
  • Soluciones
    • Publicación de vacantes
      Publica tu vacante y recibe candidatos calificados en 48h.
    • Evaluación de candidatos
      500+ pruebas técnicas y psicológicas, más anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Búsqueda ejecutiva a la medida de principio a fin.
    • Nómina + EOR
      Dispersión de nómina y EOR en más de 15 países de LATAM.
  • Precios
  • Empleos

0

252
Vistas
If a specific syntactic sugar created in a language, is it possible to take precedence over grouping operator ( ) in order of operations?

Related to:

Does the functionality of Grouping operator () in JavaScript differ from Haskell or other programming languages?

Does the Hack-style pipe operator |> take precedence over grouping operator ( ) in order of operations in JavaScript?

At least, for the latter issue, unfortunately, we still haven't reached a conclusion, therefore, I'd like to ask more generally;

If a specific syntactic sugar is created in a language, is it possible to take precedence over grouping operator ( ) in order of operations?

In the more specific issue, there is a JavaScript TC39 proposal/ hack-pipeline-operator, and the spec claims:

enter image description here

and for the functionality,

https://stackoverflow.com/a/69429001/10638454

lhs |> rhs

is syntactic sugar for

(% => rhs)(lhs)
about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
Responde la pregunta
Encuentra empleos remotos

¡Descubre la nueva forma de encontrar empleo!

Top de empleos
Top categorías de empleo
Empresas
Publicar vacante Precios Comercial
Legal
Términos y condiciones Política de privacidad
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomiéndame algunas ofertas
Necesito ayuda