Empresas
Empleos
  • Sobre nosotros
  • Soluciones
    • Publicación de vacantes
      Publica tu vacante y recibe candidatos calificados en 48h.
    • Evaluación de candidatos
      500+ pruebas técnicas y psicológicas, más anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Búsqueda ejecutiva a la medida de principio a fin.
    • Nómina + EOR
      Dispersión de nómina y EOR en más de 15 países de LATAM.
  • Precios
  • Empleos

0

209
Vistas
Does React.useCallback memoize curried functions?

I use this pattern sometimes where I declare a curried function inside useCallback.

const Child = ({ handleClick }) => {
  return (
    <>
      <button onClick={handleClick("foo")}>foo</button>
      <button onClick={handleClick("lorem")}>lorem</button>
    </>
  );
};

export default function App() {
  const [state, setState] = useState("");

  const handleClick = useCallback(
    (newState) => () => {
      setState(newState);
    },
    []
  );

  return (
    <div className="App">
      <Child handleClick={handleClick} />
      <p>{state}</p>
    </div>
  );
}

Edit serene-platform-kuzc2

because I want to pass arguments from JSX to the event handlers and to avoid multiple handlers.

When the component rerenders, handleClick will be called and the function that is returned will be assigned to the onClick prop, but will it be a new function every time or will the nested function also get memoized by useCallback?

PS: This is a simple example. Assume a useCallback usage with multiple dependencies

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
2 Respuestas
Responde la pregunta

0

Edit

Following answer refers to the initial version of the OP's code in which handleClick was not passed as a prop to Child component.


You don't really need useCallback in this case.

Actually, it would be better not to use the useCallback hook in this case because:

  1. Callback function passed to useCallback is created everytime your component re-renders. As a result, a new function is getting created anyways, just like it would without the use of useCallback

  2. Getting a memoized version of the handleClick function doesn't provides any benefit in your case. Memoization would be useful if handleClick is passed as a prop to child component(s).

...but will it be a new function every time or will the nested function also get memoized by useCallback?

No, the nested function won't be memoized.

handleClick is a memoized function but that memoized function returns a new function everytime it executes.

Invoking handleClick is just like invoking any other function - anything declared inside its body is created everytime it is invoked.

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Denunciar

0

It should, either curry or not, it's a function instance, as long as you want to keep an old function instance, you can use it.

But don't use it because the prop onClick, because when your component renders, this button has to render regardless of the onClick. So your line can be simply as

  const onClick = value => () => { setState(value) }

Or you can even promote this to a global function.

  const handle = setState => value => () => { setState(value) }

NOTE: i don't want to say useCallback most of time is useless. But actually if you don't know why you want to use a useMemo, don't use a useCallback. They are designed to skip an assignment, but not designed to skip a render, or in your case, to improve reusability. (not for that purpose).

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Denunciar
Responde la pregunta
Encuentra empleos remotos

¡Descubre la nueva forma de encontrar empleo!

Top de empleos
Top categorías de empleo
Empresas
Publicar vacante Precios Comercial
Legal
Términos y condiciones Política de privacidad
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomiéndame algunas ofertas
Necesito ayuda