I am building a relatively complex distributed Node system. Let's say there are two processes (node apps), A and B. They are defined in separate projects.
In addition, there are a couple of custom made node modules, being used in both A and B. Let's call them M and N. In addition, M is using N.
How should I correctly handle environment vars?
I guess I should define .env for both main processes (A and B), handle all ENV vars from there and simply pass the needed env vars from there, down to M and N. This way, M and N (and other internal modules) will receive their own ENV vars passed as parameters on creation.
Is this approach correct?
Having modules getting direct access to process.env is not a good idea, and modules having their own .env file is an even worse idea.
.env files should not be added to source control (ie git) because they change with the environment (dev, prod, pre-prod) and sometimes contains sensitive information (like AWS secret keys). So that would require you to paste a .env file each time you install your node_modules making your deployment process more complex.
The .env file loaded inside your module could merge in unexpected ways with the .env of your root app (remember there is only one process.env).
Imagine a case where your module would need to behave differently in two parts of your application. How would you override the data loaded via the .env file only in one place?
So in my opinion, your guess is correct: don't put .env in node_modules.
// This is better...
nModule.someMethod(process.env.PARAM1, process.env.PARAM2);
// ...than this
process.env.PARAM1 = '';
process.env.PARAM2 = '';
nModule.someMethod();
Your approach sounds correct and it should work. When you define .env file and use dotenv package, you will be able to access all the variables inside .env in your code. That means that custom made node modules will also be able to access it, and you don't have to pass them anything (you can access them directly with process.env.NAME_OF_ENVIRONMENT_VARIABLE).
SUMERIZE: Create .env file in both A and B, use dotenv package, and then you can access environment variables directly inside the code with process.env.NAME_OF_ENVIRONMENT_VARIABLE (in custom node modules also). You can create constructor (for custom modules) in modules A and B, and just pass process.env.ENV_WHATEVER as a parameters. That is even better approach since your custom module's logic will be independent from the rest of the app (it will depend only on the input).
NOTE: Don't commit your .env to Git since .env usually have some confidential information. The best practice is to create a .gitignore file and add .env in it.
RECOMMENDATION You can keep all your .env files in one centralized place for better management. You can check some password management tools like https://www.dashlane.com/ or https://www.lastpass.com/.
I feel strongly that environment variables are reserved for, well, the environment. This to me implies a few things:
process.env.process.env is really a question of how you start your programs A and B. I personally prefer systemd services for that which have excellent support for defining the runtime environment. The dotenv package seems more like a crutch, but it's fine from the program's perspective.