0
323
VistasWhy my java lambda expression cannot work while its imperative style works properly?
I have years experience of Java 8 and its lambda. But I met a insane problem when I developed a hello-world-size Spark program.
Here I have a Java class, in which the Data annotation is from Lombok:
@Data
public class Person implements Serializable {
private String name;
private Long age;
}
And then I built a java list containing objects of Persion class:
Person p1 = new Person("sb", 1L);
Person p2 = new Person("sth", null);
List<Person> list = new ArrayList<>(2);
list.add(p1);
list.add(p2);
so good so far. And then I tried to generate a Spark Dataset using the list:
SparkSession session = SparkSession.builder().master("local[1]").appName("SparkSqlApp").getOrCreate();
Encoder<Person> personEncoder = Encoders.bean(Person.class);
Dataset<Person> dataset1 = session.createDataset(list, personEncoder);
dataset1.foreach(new ForeachFunction<Person>() { // 1
@Override
public void call(Person person) throws Exception {
System.out.println(person);
}
});
dataset1.foreach((ForeachFunction<Person>) System.out::println); //2
Notice that, the block 1 is equivalent to block 2 in java and the block 2 is simplified from block 1 by IntelliJ IDEA. The only difference is block 2 is using lambda expression.
However, when I execute the program, block 1 ends well while block 2 run in exception:
What the... big earth and big universe? Why the JVM or Spark engine does things like this?!
2 Respuestas
Responde la pregunta0
As explained in What is the equivalent lambda expression for System.out::println, the method reference System.out::println is not identical to the lambda expression x -> System.out.println(x).
The method reference captures the current value of System.out, to invoke println on it each time the function is invoked, rather than evaluating System.out again each time as the lambda expression’s body does.
As also said, this rarely makes a difference, but here, it does. When you try to serialize the function, it will try to serialize all captured values, including the PrintStream instance read from System.out during the instantiation. The PrintStream is not serializable and it would be quite challenging to implement a serializable PrintStream fulfilling the expectations.
But it’s important to keep in mind that when you serialize the lambda expression x -> System.out.println(x) or an equivalent class object and deserialize it in a different environment, the System.out it will read there will evaluate to a different PrintStream than in your original environment. This doesn’t matter when the distributed computing framework takes care to pipe everything printed to the standard output back to the originator.
But it’s important to keep in mind that static fields which are not part of the serialized data may have different contents in different environments in general.
0
The interface ForeachFunction extends Serializable. Dataset.foreach(f) may be serializing the argument f. In the following test, testBlock1 succeeds and testBlcok2 fails (NotSerializableException). But I don't know why.
public class AAA implements Serializable {
@FunctionalInterface
public interface ForeachFunction<T> extends Serializable {
void call(T t) throws Exception;
}
@Test
public void testBlock1() throws FileNotFoundException, IOException {
ForeachFunction<String> functionBody = new ForeachFunction<String>() {
public void call(String t) throws Exception {
System.out.println(t);
}
};
try (FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream("data/block1.obj");
ObjectOutputStream oos = new ObjectOutputStream(fos)) {
oos.writeObject(functionBody); // success
}
}
@Test
public void testBlock2() throws FileNotFoundException, IOException {
ForeachFunction<String> functionBody = System.out::println;
try (FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream("data/block2.obj");
ObjectOutputStream oos = new ObjectOutputStream(fos)) {
oos.writeObject(functionBody); // fail (NotSerializableException)
}
}
}