Empresas
Empleos
  • Sobre nosotros
  • Soluciones
    • Publicación de vacantes
      Publica tu vacante y recibe candidatos calificados en 48h.
    • Evaluación de candidatos
      500+ pruebas técnicas y psicológicas, más anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Búsqueda ejecutiva a la medida de principio a fin.
    • Nómina + EOR
      Dispersión de nómina y EOR en más de 15 países de LATAM.
  • Precios
  • Empleos

0

350
Vistas
TaskCompletionSource throws "An attempt was made to transition a task to a final state when it had already completed"

I want to use TaskCompletionSource to wrap MyService which is a simple service:

public static Task<string> ProcessAsync(MyService service, int parameter)
{
    var tcs = new TaskCompletionSource<string>();
    //Every time ProccessAsync is called this assigns to Completed!
    service.Completed += (sender, e)=>{ tcs.SetResult(e.Result); };   
    service.RunAsync(parameter);
    return tcs.Task;
}

This code is working well for the first time. But the second time I call ProcessAsync simply the event handler for the Completed is assign again (the same service variable is used every time) and thus it will execute twice! and the second time it throws this exception:

attempt transition task final state when already completed

I'm not sure, should I declare the tcs as a class level variable like this:

TaskCompletionSource<string> tcs;

public static Task<string> ProccessAsync(MyService service, int parameter)
{
    tcs = new TaskCompletionSource<string>();
    service.Completed -= completedHandler; 
    service.Completed += completedHandler;
    return tcs.Task;    
}

private void completedHandler(object sender, CustomEventArg e)
{
    tcs.SetResult(e.Result); 
}

I have to wrap many methods with different return types and this way I have to write lost of code, variables, event handlers so I'm not sure if this is the best practice in this scenarios. So is there any better way of doing this job?

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
3 Respuestas
Responde la pregunta

0

The issue here is that the Completed event is raised on each action but the TaskCompletionSource can only be completed once.

You can still use a local TaskCompletionSource (and you should). You just need to unregister the callback before completing the TaskCompletionSource. That way this specific callback with this specific TaskCompletionSource will never be called again:

public static Task<string> ProcessAsync(MyService service, int parameter)
{
    var tcs = new TaskCompletionSource<string>();
    EventHandler<CustomEventArg> callback = null;
    callback = (sender, e) => 
    {
        service.Completed -= callback;
        tcs.SetResult(e.Result); 
    };
    service.Completed += callback;
    service.RunAsync(parameter);
    return tcs.Task;
}

This will also solve the possible memory leak that you have when your service keeps references to all these delegates.

You should keep in mind though that you can't have multiple of these operations running concurrently. At least not unless you have a way to match requests and responses.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Denunciar

0

It appears that MyService will raise the Completed event more than once. this causes SetResult to be called more than once which causes your error.

You have 3 options that I see. Change the Completed event to only be raised once (Seems odd that you can complete more than once), change SetResult to TrySetResult so it does not throw a exception when you try to set it a 2nd time (this does introduce a small memory leak as the event still gets called and the completion source still tries to be set), or unsubscribe from the event (i3arnon's answer)

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Denunciar

0

An alternative solution to i3arnon's answer would be:

public async static Task<string> ProcessAsync(MyService service, int parameter)
{
    var tcs = new TaskCompletionSource<string>();

    EventHandler<CustomEventArg> callback = 
        (s, e) => tcs.SetResult(e.Result);

    try
    {
        contacts.Completed  += callback;

        contacts.RunAsync(parameter);

        return await tcs.Task;
    }
    finally
    {
        contacts.Completed  -= callback;
    }
}

However, this solution will have a compiler generated state machine. It will use more memory and CPU.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Denunciar
Responde la pregunta
Encuentra empleos remotos

¡Descubre la nueva forma de encontrar empleo!

Top de empleos
Top categorías de empleo
Empresas
Publicar vacante Precios Comercial
Legal
Términos y condiciones Política de privacidad
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomiéndame algunas ofertas
Necesito ayuda