Empresas
Empleos
  • Sobre nosotros
  • Soluciones
    • Publicación de vacantes
      Publica tu vacante y recibe candidatos calificados en 48h.
    • Evaluación de candidatos
      500+ pruebas técnicas y psicológicas, más anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Búsqueda ejecutiva a la medida de principio a fin.
    • Nómina + EOR
      Dispersión de nómina y EOR en más de 15 países de LATAM.
  • Precios
  • Empleos

0

293
Vistas
Child process starts after parent process

I have a simple code to test the fork() function.

    #include<stdio.h>
    #include<unistd.h>
    #define MAX_COUNT 10
    void main(void)
    {
        pid_t pid;
        int i;
        fork();
        pid = getpid();
        for(i = 1; i <= MAX_COUNT; i++)
        {
            printf("PID = %d, i = %d\n", pid, i);
        }
    }

It didn't work as I expected.

My expectation is: parent's result and child's result appear alternately. Can someone explain this and teach me how to fix it? Thanks!

    PID = 3663, i = 1
    PID = 3663, i = 2
    PID = 3663, i = 3
    PID = 3663, i = 4
    PID = 3663, i = 5
    PID = 3663, i = 6
    PID = 3663, i = 7
    PID = 3663, i = 8
    PID = 3663, i = 9
    PID = 3663, i = 10
    PID = 3664, i = 1
    PID = 3664, i = 2
    PID = 3664, i = 3
    PID = 3664, i = 4
    PID = 3664, i = 5
    PID = 3664, i = 6
    PID = 3664, i = 7
    PID = 3664, i = 8
    PID = 3664, i = 9
    PID = 3664, i = 10
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
2 Respuestas
Responde la pregunta

0

The explanation is simple. Scheduling of processes is up to the kernel. If this is a single core processor then in this run it decided to suspend the child execution and allow the parent process to run first. The parent ran for a few loops before being suspended in favor of the child, and so forth.
In a multiprocessor system both process can run in tandem but the console device will alternate the output depending on timing of interrupts.

There is no assurance a different run will result in the same output. There is also no assurance that different kernel version won't do something else.

If you want the processes to alternate between loops now is the time to learn interprocess communication.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Denunciar

0

The main process isn't giving up control immediately, and the for loop executes so fast that it is done before the second process gets scheduled. When I execute your code I get non-sequential prints, but the behavior is system dependent.

It sometimes helps to throw sleep() commands around when you're playing with fork(). Try this code...

#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

#define MAX_COUNT 10
int main(void)
{
  pid_t pid;
  int i;
  fork();

  pid = getpid();

  srand(pid); // Make sure each process has a different seed

  for(i = 1; i <= MAX_COUNT; i++)
  {
    printf("PID = %d, i = %d\n", pid, i);

    // Sleep 1-3 seconds.
    unsigned int sleep_seconds = rand() % 3 + 1;
    sleep(sleep_seconds);
  }
}
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Denunciar
Responde la pregunta
Encuentra empleos remotos

¡Descubre la nueva forma de encontrar empleo!

Top de empleos
Top categorías de empleo
Empresas
Publicar vacante Precios Comercial
Legal
Términos y condiciones Política de privacidad
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomiéndame algunas ofertas
Necesito ayuda