Empresas
Empleos
  • Sobre nosotros
  • Soluciones
    • Publicación de vacantes
      Publica tu vacante y recibe candidatos calificados en 48h.
    • Evaluación de candidatos
      500+ pruebas técnicas y psicológicas, más anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Búsqueda ejecutiva a la medida de principio a fin.
    • Nómina + EOR
      Dispersión de nómina y EOR en más de 15 países de LATAM.
  • Precios
  • Empleos

0

174
Vistas
Why do we needed pickBy in Lodash when We can use delete operator instead?

I have a small question.

Why do we needed pickBy in Lodash or similar? Just simple with delete operator.

// Input
const source = {
  user: {
    firstname: "John",
    lastname: "Done"
  },
  password: "123"
};
// Output
const result = {
  user: {
    firstname: "John",
    lastname: "Done"
  }
};

There are many ways to get the desired result: https://codesandbox.io/s/cool-rubin-xlj25k?file=/src/index.ts

With pickBy:

const result = _.pickBy(
  source,
  (value, key) => !(key === "password" && value === "123")
);

With native:

const result = Object.fromEntries(
  Object.entries(source).filter(
    ([key, value]) => !(key === "password" && value === "123")
  )
);

And with delete operator: Lightweight, fastest, no loop,...vv

const result = Object.assign({}, source);
if (result.password === "123") {
  delete result.password;
}

So, I'm looking for reasons not to use delete operator.


--UPDATED for mutation issue:

All ways are mutated user.firstname

source.user.firstname = "New first name";
console.log({ source, result  });
{
  "source": {
    "user": {
      "firstname": "New first name",
      "lastname": "Done"
    },
    "password": "123"
  },
  "result": {
    "user": {
      "firstname": "New first name",
      "lastname": "Done"
    }
  }
}
about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
1 Respuestas
Responde la pregunta

0

Lightweight, fastest, no loop,...vv

Sure, if you're deleting a single key, use delete.

pickBy, as the name implies, is meant for predicate-function-based picking (filtering) of items, which is not what delete does without a loop.

For instance, if your (fictitious) goal is to turn

{
  "foo": "bar",
  "baz": "quux",
  "beq": "berp",
  "uub": "uuzpq",
}

into

{
  "beq": "berp",
  "uub": "uuzpq",
}

i.e. where the key and value start with the same letter – who knows why you'd need that but that's beside the point, you'd have a worse time with a loop and delete than with pickBy.

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Denunciar
Responde la pregunta
Encuentra empleos remotos

¡Descubre la nueva forma de encontrar empleo!

Top de empleos
Top categorías de empleo
Empresas
Publicar vacante Precios Comercial
Legal
Términos y condiciones Política de privacidad
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomiéndame algunas ofertas
Necesito ayuda