Empresas
Empleos
  • Sobre nosotros
  • Soluciones
    • Publicación de vacantes
      Publica tu vacante y recibe candidatos calificados en 48h.
    • Evaluación de candidatos
      500+ pruebas técnicas y psicológicas, más anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Búsqueda ejecutiva a la medida de principio a fin.
    • Nómina + EOR
      Dispersión de nómina y EOR en más de 15 países de LATAM.
  • Precios
  • Empleos

0

92
Vistas
Return undefined when using reduce

Consider the following array:

const books = [
  {
    id: 1,
    name: 'A song of ice and fire',
    genre: 'Fantasy',
    author: {
      name: 'George R. R. Martin',
      birthYear: 1948,
    },
    releaseYear: 1991,
  },
  {
    id: 2,
    name: 'The lord of the rings',
    genre: 'Fantasy',
    author: {
      name: 'J. R. R. Tolkien',
      birthYear: 1892,
    },
    releaseYear: 1954,
  },
  {
];

Suppose I want to print the book with the longest title. The following works:

const longestBook = () => {
  const longestName = books.reduce((accumulator, book) => {
      if (book.name.length > accumulator.name.length) {
        return book;
      }
      return accumulator;
    });
  return longestName
}

console.log(longestBook().name);

My question is, why can't I return book.name / accumulator.name directly instead of using .name only when calling the function? If I try to do so, the result is undefined.

const longestBook = () => {
  const longestName = books.reduce((accumulator, book) => {
      if (book.name.length > accumulator.name.length) {
        return book.name;
      }
      return accumulator.name;
    });
  return longestName
}

console.log(longestBook());
about 4 years ago · Santiago Gelvez
3 Respuestas
Responde la pregunta

0

If the accumulator becomes the .name property, it will be a plain string and no longer have a .name property to compare in the next iteration.

You'd need to be consistent with your accumulator type from the very start by providing an initial value. An empty string would suffice...

return books.reduce(
  (acc, { name }) => name.length > acc ? name : acc,  
  "" // initial value
);
about 4 years ago · Santiago Gelvez Denunciar

0

With reduce, you're passing along a single value - the accumulator - from the previous iteration to the current iteration. In decently-structured reduce callbacks, the accumulator should usually stay the same shape throughout the loop, so that logic can be performed on it predictably and consistenly.

If you try to return the .name only, there are problems:

  const longestName = books.reduce((accumulator, book) => {
      if (book.name.length > accumulator.name.length) {
        return book.name;
      }
      return accumulator.name;
    });

because

  • Because you did not provide an initial value, the accumulator for the first iteration will be the first book object
  • Inside the first iteration, you return a .name from either the first book object or the second book object. The name is a string, so this results in the accumulator being a string for the second iteration
  • In the second iteration, the accumulator is now a string - not a book object - so return accumulator.name does not return anything.
about 4 years ago · Santiago Gelvez Denunciar

0

You'll be accumulating a string instead of an object, so you're entire reduce() method needs to be geared towards that.

That also means you'll need to provide an initial value for reduce(). By default it takes the first value of the array, which is an object, and not a string.

const books = [{
  id: 1,
  name: 'A song of ice and fire',
  genre: 'Fantasy',
  author: {
    name: 'George R. R. Martin',
    birthYear: 1948,
  },
  releaseYear: 1991,
}, {
  id: 2,
  name: 'The lord of the rings',
  genre: 'Fantasy',
  author: {
    name: 'J. R. R. Tolkien',
    birthYear: 1892,
  },
  releaseYear: 1954,
}];


const longestBook = () => {
  const longestName = books.reduce((accumulator, { name }) => {
    if (name.length > accumulator.length) {
      return name;
    }
    return accumulator;
  }, '');
  return longestName;
}

console.log(longestBook());

about 4 years ago · Santiago Gelvez Denunciar
Responde la pregunta
Encuentra empleos remotos

¡Descubre la nueva forma de encontrar empleo!

Top de empleos
Top categorías de empleo
Empresas
Publicar vacante Precios Comercial
Legal
Términos y condiciones Política de privacidad
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomiéndame algunas ofertas
Necesito ayuda