I'm trying to run a query where the 'GroupBy' clause will group the results differently according to say, an enum value which would be databound to a combobox etc.
I tried to do this with a switch case, but this resulted in compiler error CS0411 on the 'GroupBy' clause, because as I understand it, the type of the object returned from the lambda will be different depending on which case is executed.
How can I neatly achieve this functionality?
I have enclosed a minimal example of the problem below, as a console program.
class Program
{
static List<Person> People;
enum GroupBy
{
Month,
Year
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
People = new List<Person>();
People.Add(new Person()
{
Dob = new DateTime(2000,10,1),
Name = "James",
IsSelected = false
});
People.Add(new Person()
{
Dob = new DateTime(2000, 5, 1),
Name = "Anne",
IsSelected = true
});
People.Add(new Person()
{
Dob = new DateTime(2000, 5, 23),
Name = "Bob",
IsSelected = true
});
People.Add(new Person()
{
Dob = new DateTime(1999, 1, 15),
Name = "Kate",
IsSelected = false
});
// Obviously, in the real thing, the grouping value would be
// databound to a combobox or something.
GroupBy grouping = GroupBy.Month;
var groups = People
.OrderBy(x => x.Dob)
.GroupBy(x => /* PROBLEM LINE - Gives compiler error CS0411 */
{
switch(grouping)
{
case GroupBy.Month:
return new { x.Dob.Year, x.Dob.Month };
case GroupBy.Year:
return new { x.Dob.Year};
default:
throw new Exception("No can do");
}
});
Console.WriteLine("Grouping is: " + grouping + "\r\n");
foreach(var group in groups)
{
Console.WriteLine("Group: " + group.Key);
foreach(Person p in group)
{
Console.WriteLine("\t" + p.Name + ", " + p.Dob);
}
Console.WriteLine("");
}
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
public class Person
{
public DateTime Dob { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public bool IsSelected { get; set; }
}
The problem occurs in your switch statement when returning anonymous types. The compiler cannot infer the type (because it is generated by the compiler for each separate projection) and throws an error as a result.
You can easily work around this by creating a wrapper class:
public class GroupedResult
{
public int Year { get; set; }
public int Month { get; set; }
}
var groups = People
.OrderBy(x => x.Dob)
.GroupBy(x => /* PROBLEM LINE - Gives compiler error CS0411 */
{
switch (grouping)
{
case GroupBy.Month:
return new GroupedResult { Year = x.Dob.Year, Month = x.Dob.Month };
case GroupBy.Year:
return new GroupedResult { Year = x.Dob.Year };
default:
throw new Exception("No can do");
}
});
OR by ensuring that same properties exist on both anonymous types, resulting in the same compiler-generated type:
var groups = People
.OrderBy(x => x.Dob)
.GroupBy(x => /* PROBLEM LINE - Gives compiler error CS0411 */
{
switch (grouping)
{
case GroupBy.Month:
return new { Year = x.Dob.Year, Month = x.Dob.Month };
case GroupBy.Year:
return new { Year = x.Dob.Year, Month = 0 };
default:
throw new Exception("No can do");
}
});
The simplest solution:
.GroupBy(x => new
{
Year = x.Dob.Year,
Month = grouping == GroupBy.Month ? x.Dob.Month : 0
};
Year is always part of your groupingMonth will be part of your grouping only if grouping equals to Month
I would suggest to avoid to throw exception inside a GroupBy delegate.