Empresas
Empleos
  • Sobre nosotros
  • Soluciones
    • Publicación de vacantes
      Publica tu vacante y recibe candidatos calificados en 48h.
    • Evaluación de candidatos
      500+ pruebas técnicas y psicológicas, más anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Búsqueda ejecutiva a la medida de principio a fin.
    • Nómina + EOR
      Dispersión de nómina y EOR en más de 15 países de LATAM.
  • Precios
  • Empleos

0

200
Vistas
Best practice for initializing a variable when using @Input decorator in Angular

Let's assume we have an Interface Customer:

export interface Customer {
    name: string;
    age: number;
    phone: string;
}

Now we have a parent component and we want to pass an instance of Customer to the child component:

<child-component [customer]="instanceOfCustomer"></child-component>

After that we need to use @Input decorator to get the data in the child component. (We assume passing the instance is mandatory to use this component and this component will not work without passing the instance)

@Input() customer:Customer;

The problem is that we need to initialize customer somewhere and I think there are 3 approaches to avoid the error in Typescript:

  1. Initializing an empty customer in the constructor:

    this.customer = {
        name: "";
        age: 0;
        phone: "";
    }
    
  2. Change strictPropertyInitialization to false

  3. Just adding the ! prefix (Which I think I should use because no one should use this child component without passing the relative customer)

    @Input() customer!:Customer;
    

I want to know what approach should I use to avoid property initialization error in case of using @Input decorator.

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
2 Respuestas
Responde la pregunta

0

you should use setter https://angular.io/guide/component-interaction#intercept-input-property-changes-with-a-setter

or you can also use your 3rd approach.

there is already some answers for this too.

refer below answers for more details :

Make directive @Input required

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Denunciar

0

To avoid TS from complaining I'll suggest initializing it like this:

@Input() customer: Customer | null = null;

Using null will stop the compiler from complaining when you pass the input through the async pipe (the async pipe returns something like T | null).

Also by doing that you'll have to make sure that you account for null values wherever you use that property, so fewer errors to deal with in production if something goes wrong let's say.

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Denunciar
Responde la pregunta
Encuentra empleos remotos

¡Descubre la nueva forma de encontrar empleo!

Top de empleos
Top categorías de empleo
Empresas
Publicar vacante Precios Comercial
Legal
Términos y condiciones Política de privacidad
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomiéndame algunas ofertas
Necesito ayuda