Empresas
Empregos
  • Sobre nós
  • Soluções
    • Publicação de vagas
      Publique sua vaga e receba candidatos qualificados em 48h.
    • Avaliações de candidatos
      Mais de 500 testes técnicos e psicológicos, mais anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Busca executiva personalizada do início ao fim.
    • Folha de Pagamento + EOR
      Dispersão de folha e EOR em mais de 15 países da LATAM.
  • Preços
  • Empregos

0

122
Visualizações
Typescript - Conditional Type / Optional

I have a component, It takes arguments such as :

interface Props {
  label: string;
  children?: React.ReactNode;
  withoutActions?: boolean;
  fieldKey?: KeyProperties;
  corporate: Corporate;
}

The withoutActions and fieldKey are used by a form. If the withoutActions prop is true, then there should not be a provided fieldKey.

However, if my withoutActions is undefined, then i should enforce my fieldLabel to be of type **KeyProperties** which is a specific list of available values for it.

If withoutActions is undefined, the other SHOULD NOT be defined at all If withoutActions is true, the other SHOULD be defined respecting the specific keyProperties type.

How can i implement that ?

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
2 Respostas
Responde à pergunta

0

I did not fully understand your requirement, but I would use a type alias instead of an interface. E.g. something like this:

  type Props = {
    label: string,
    children?: React.ReactNode,
    withoutActions: true,
    corporate: Corporate
  } | {
    label: string,
    children?: React.ReactNode,
    withoutActions: undefined,
    fieldKey: KeyProperties,
    corporate: Corporate
  }
about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Relatório

0

Similar to the other answer, but you can refactor it a bit to be cleaner. You did not specify what the expected behavior is if withoutActions is false instead of true or undefined. Here, I assume the behavior for false and undefined are the same. If false is not a valid type, you could just swap withoutActions?: false for withoutActions: undefined like the other answer.

type Props = {
  label: string;
  children?: React.ReactNode;
  corporate: Corporate;
} & (
  {
    withoutActions: true;
  } |
  {
    withoutActions?: false;
    fieldKey: KeyProperties;
  }
)

However, there is an important pitfall here that you should be aware of. Because of TypeScript's structural typing, you only get excess property checking when you are directly assigning an object literal. You do not get excess property checking when you assign an an object as an inferred type. TypeScript and React treat direct props declarations as if they are object literals, and will do excess property checking like you seem to desire. However in some cases, if you assign objects to variables and let their type be inferred, TypeScript may not warn that there is an excess property present.

Check out this demo based on your original example. Example #1 and #2 will error because of excess property checking, but example #3 will not.

const ExampleOne = () => {
  // Type error - excess property checking
  return <Component label={''} corporate={''} withoutActions fieldKey={''} />;
}

const ExampleTwo = () => {
  const props: Props = {
    label: '',
    corporate: '',
    withoutActions: true,
  // Type error - excess property checking
    fieldKey: '',
  }

  return <Component {...props} />;
}

const ExampleThree = () => {
  const props = {
    label: '',
    corporate: '',
    withoutActions: true,
    fieldKey: '',
  }

  // No type error - no excess property checking
  return <Component {...props} />;
}
about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Relatório
Responde à pergunta
Encontrar trabalhos remotos

Descubra a nova forma de encontrar um emprego!

melhores empregos
Principais categorias de trabalho
Empresas
Postar vaga Preços Comercial
Jurídico
Termos e Condições Política de privacidade
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomende algumas ofertas para mim
Preciso de ajuda