Empresas
Empregos
  • Sobre nós
  • Soluções
    • Publicação de vagas
      Publique sua vaga e receba candidatos qualificados em 48h.
    • Avaliações de candidatos
      Mais de 500 testes técnicos e psicológicos, mais anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Busca executiva personalizada do início ao fim.
    • Folha de Pagamento + EOR
      Dispersão de folha e EOR em mais de 15 países da LATAM.
  • Preços
  • Empregos

0

597
Visualizações
How to add custom message to Jest expect?

Image following test case:

it('valid emails checks', () => {
  ['abc@y.com', 'a@b.nz'/*, ...*/].map(mail => {
    expect(isValid(mail)).toBe(true);
  });
});

I would like to add auto-generated message for each email like Email 'f@f.com' should be valid so that it's easy to find failing test cases.

Something like:

// .map(email =>
expect(isValid(email), `Email ${email} should be valid`).toBe(true);

Is it possible in Jest ?

In Chai it was possible to do with second parameter like expect(value, 'custom fail message').to.be... and in Jasmine seems like it's done with .because clause. But cannot find solution in Jest.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
3 Respostas
Responde à pergunta

0

You try this lib that extends jest: https://github.com/mattphillips/jest-expect-message

test('returns 2 when adding 1 and 1', () => {
  expect(1 + 1, 'Woah this should be 2!').toBe(3);
});
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Relatório

0

I don't think it's possible to provide a message like that. But you could define your own matcher.

For example you could create a toBeValid(validator) matcher:

expect.extend({
  toBeValid(received, validator) {
    if (validator(received)) {
      return {
        message: () => `Email ${received} should NOT be valid`,
        pass: true
      };
    } else {
      return {
        message: () => `Email ${received} should be valid`,
        pass: false
      };
    }
  }
});

And then you use it like this:

expect(mail).toBeValid(isValid);

Note: toBeValid returns a message for both cases (success and failure), because it allows you to use .not. The test will fail with the corresponding message depending on whether you want it to pass the validation.

expect(mail).toBeValid(isValid);
// pass === true: Test passes
// pass === false: Failure: Email ... should be valid

expect(mail).not.toBeValid(isValid);
// pass === true: Failure: Email ... should NOT be valid
// pass === false: Test passes
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Relatório

0

Although it's not a general solution, for the common case of wanting a custom exception message to distinguish items in a loop, you can instead use Jest's test.each.

For example, your sample code:

it('valid emails checks', () => {
  ['abc@y.com', 'a@b.nz'/*, ...*/].map(mail => {
    expect(isValid(mail)).toBe(true);
  });
});

Could instead become

test.each(
    ['abc@y.com', 'a@b.nz'/*, ...*/],
    'checks that email %s is valid',
    mail => {
        expect(isValid(mail)).toBe(true);
    }
);
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Relatório
Responde à pergunta
Encontrar trabalhos remotos

Descubra a nova forma de encontrar um emprego!

melhores empregos
Principais categorias de trabalho
Empresas
Postar vaga Preços Comercial
Jurídico
Termos e Condições Política de privacidade
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomende algumas ofertas para mim
Preciso de ajuda