Empresas
Empregos
  • Sobre nós
  • Soluções
    • Publicação de vagas
      Publique sua vaga e receba candidatos qualificados em 48h.
    • Avaliações de candidatos
      Mais de 500 testes técnicos e psicológicos, mais anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Busca executiva personalizada do início ao fim.
    • Folha de Pagamento + EOR
      Dispersão de folha e EOR em mais de 15 países da LATAM.
  • Preços
  • Empregos

0

305
Visualizações
Is it bad practice to accept setState as a function parameter in React?

Basically, before uploading an image to the firebase, I'm trying to control the input as:

export const controlThumbnail = (selectedThumbnail, setThumbnailError) => {
  if (!selectedThumbnail) {
    setThumbnailError('Please select a thumbnail!');

    return;
  }

  if (!selectedThumbnail.type.includes('image')) {
    setThumbnailError('Please select an image!');

    return;
  }

  if (selectedThumbnail.size > 1000000) {
    setThumbnailError('Image size must be less than 1MB!');

    return;
  }

  setThumbnailError(null);
};

which I call the above method from /lib/controlThumbnail.js to:

import { controlThumbnail } from '../../lib/controlThumbnail';
    
const Signup = () => {
  const [userInfo, setUserInfo] = useState({
    name: '',
    email: '',
    password: '',
    thumbnail: null
  });
  const [thumbnailError, setThumbnailError] = useState(null);


  const userInputHandler = (e) => {
    setUserInfo((prevUserInfo) => {
      if (e.target.name === 'thumbnail') {
        const thumbnail = e.target.files[0];
        controlThumbnail(thumbnail, setThumbnailError);

        return { ...prevUserInfo, thumbnail };
      } else {
        return { ...prevUserInfo, [e.target.name]: e.target.value };
      }
    });
  };
...

so, this is now works correctly, but I wonder if this is the good way of doing it? Or should I put the control method inside the component and never give setState as parameter?

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
1 Respostas
Responde à pergunta

0

It is subjective. Personally, I think the controlThumbnail function is not the right place to make that abstraction. In here, you are really only providing validation. You don't need to give it the responsibility to validate AND set some state.

You could create a pure validation function, and just use the return of this to update the state in your Signup component:

const validateThumbnail = (thumbnail) => {
  if (!thumbnail) {
    return 'Please select a thumbnail!';
  }

  if (!thumbnail.type.includes('image')) {
    return 'Please select an image!'
  }

  if (thumbnail.size > 1000000) {
    return 'Image size must be less than 1MB!'
  }

  return null
}

const Signup = () => {
  const [userInfo, setUserInfo] = useState({
    name: '',
    email: '',
    password: '',
    thumbnail: null
  });
  const [thumbnailError, setThumbnailError] = useState(null);


  const userInputHandler = (e) => {
    setUserInfo((prevUserInfo) => {
      if (e.target.name === 'thumbnail') {
        const thumbnail = e.target.files[0];
        setThumbnailError(validateThumbnail(thumbnail));
        return { ...prevUserInfo, thumbnail };
      }
      return { ...prevUserInfo, [e.target.name]: e.target.value };
    });
  }
}
about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Relatório
Responde à pergunta
Encontrar trabalhos remotos

Descubra a nova forma de encontrar um emprego!

melhores empregos
Principais categorias de trabalho
Empresas
Postar vaga Preços Comercial
Jurídico
Termos e Condições Política de privacidade
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomende algumas ofertas para mim
Preciso de ajuda