Empresas
Empregos
  • Sobre nós
  • Soluções
    • Publicação de vagas
      Publique sua vaga e receba candidatos qualificados em 48h.
    • Avaliações de candidatos
      Mais de 500 testes técnicos e psicológicos, mais anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Busca executiva personalizada do início ao fim.
    • Folha de Pagamento + EOR
      Dispersão de folha e EOR em mais de 15 países da LATAM.
  • Preços
  • Empregos

0

781
Visualizações
Moq ReturnsAsync() with parameters

I'm trying to mock a repository's method like that

public async Task<WhitelistItem> GetByTypeValue(WhitelistType type, string value)

using Moq ReturnsAsync, like this:

static List<WhitelistItem> whitelist = new List<WhitelistItem>();

var whitelistRepositoryMock = new Mock<IWhitelistRepository>();

whitelistRepositoryMock.Setup(w => w.GetByTypeValue(It.IsAny<WhitelistType>(), It.IsAny<string>()))
                                    .ReturnsAsync((WhitelistType type, string value) =>
                                    {
                                        return (from  item in whitelist
                                                where item.Type == type && item.Value == value
                                                select item).FirstOrDefault();
                                    });

but i'm getting this error in the line "... ReturnsAsync((WhitelistType type...):

Cannot convert lambda expression to type 'Model.WhitelistItem' because it is not a delegate type

WhitelistType is an Enum like that:

public enum WhitelistType
    {
        UserName,
        PostalCode
    }

I searched by hours and didn't found any answer to my problem.

Any clues?

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
2 Respostas
Responde à pergunta

0

From Moq v4.5.28 onwards

You can use ReturnsAsync with lambdas, exactly as in the code example of the question. No need to use Task.FromResult() any more. You just need to specify the types of the lambda delegate arguments. Otherwise you will get the same error message:

Cannot convert lambda expression to type 'Model.WhitelistItem' because it is not a delegate type

To give an example, the following works with the latest version of Moq:

whitelistRepositoryMock.Setup(w => w.GetByTypeValue(It.IsAny<WhitelistType>(), It.IsAny<string>()))
                                .ReturnsAsync((WhitelistType type, string value) =>
                                {
                                    return (from  item in whitelist
                                            where item.Type == type && item.Value == value
                                            select item).FirstOrDefault();
                                });

Before Moq v4.5.28 (answer provided by Alexei Levenkov)

You have to use Returns with Task.FromResult:

.Returns((WhitelistType type, string value) =>
 {
     return Task.FromResult(
       (from  item in whitelist
           where item.Type == type && item.Value == value
           select item).FirstOrDefault()
       );
});
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Relatório

0

I know this is an old question, but the one answer given here did not work for me and I was able to figure it out. It seems that you have to include the mocked function's argument types as type parameters to ReturnsAsync() first, followed by the mocked class type, and then the return type.

For example: .ReturnsAsync<T1, T2, TMock, TResult>((arg1, arg2) => { ... } )

Where T1, T2 are the types of your mocked function's arguments, and (arg1, arg2) are the actual arguments given when the mock was called.

So given the code from the OP, it would look like this:

whitelistRepositoryMock.Setup(w => w.GetByTypeValue(It.IsAny<WhitelistType>(), It.IsAny<string>()))
                       .ReturnsAsync<WhitelistType, string, IWhiteListRepository, WhitelistItem>((type, value) =>
                       {
                            return (from  item in whitelist
                                    where item.Type == type && item.Value == value
                                    select item).FirstOrDefault();
                       });

Edit: I realized later in the previous answer that the types are given in the lambda which does work. If you leave out the types, like I did, it will not. You would have to use the form I used.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Relatório
Responde à pergunta
Encontrar trabalhos remotos

Descubra a nova forma de encontrar um emprego!

melhores empregos
Principais categorias de trabalho
Empresas
Postar vaga Preços Comercial
Jurídico
Termos e Condições Política de privacidade
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomende algumas ofertas para mim
Preciso de ajuda