Empresas
Empregos
  • Sobre nós
  • Soluções
    • Publicação de vagas
      Publique sua vaga e receba candidatos qualificados em 48h.
    • Avaliações de candidatos
      Mais de 500 testes técnicos e psicológicos, mais anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Busca executiva personalizada do início ao fim.
    • Folha de Pagamento + EOR
      Dispersão de folha e EOR em mais de 15 países da LATAM.
  • Preços
  • Empregos

0

89
Visualizações
Task.Factory.StartNew with async lambda and Task.WaitAll

I'm trying to use Task.WaitAll on a list of tasks. The thing is the tasks are an async lambda which breaks Tasks.WaitAll as it never waits.

Here is an example code block:

List<Task> tasks = new List<Task>();
tasks.Add(Task.Factory.StartNew(async () =>
{
    using (dbContext = new DatabaseContext())
    {
        var records = await dbContext.Where(r => r.Id = 100).ToListAsync();
        //do long cpu process here...
    }
}
Task.WaitAll(tasks);
//do more stuff here  

This doesn't wait because of the async lambda. So how am I supposed to await I/O operations in my lambda?

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
3 Respostas
Responde à pergunta

0

Task.Factory.StartNew doesn't recognise async delegates as there is no overload that accepts a function returning a Task.

This plus other reasons (see StartNew is dangerous) is why you should be using Task.Run here:

tasks.Add(Task.Run(async () => ...
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Relatório

0

This doesn't wait because of the async lambda. So how am I supposed to await I/O operations in my lambda?

The reason Task.WaitAll doesn't wait for the completion of the IO work presented by your async lambda is because Task.Factory.StartNew actually returns a Task<Task>. Since your list is a List<Task> (and Task<T> derives from Task), you wait on the outer task started by StartNew, while ignoring the inner one created by the async lambda. This is why they say Task.Factory.StartNew is dangerous with respect to async.

How could you fix this? You could explicitly call Task<Task>.Unwrap() in order to get the inner task:

List<Task> tasks = new List<Task>();
tasks.Add(Task.Factory.StartNew(async () =>
{
    using (dbContext = new DatabaseContext())
    {
        var records = await dbContext.Where(r => r.Id = 100).ToListAsync();
        //do long cpu process here...
    }
}).Unwrap());

Or like others said, you could call Task.Run instead:

tasks.Add(Task.Run(async () => /* lambda */);

Also, since you want to be doing things right, you'll want to use Task.WhenAll, why is asynchronously waitable, instead of Task.WaitAll which synchronously blocks:

await Task.WhenAll(tasks);
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Relatório

0

You can do like this.

    void Something()
    {
        List<Task> tasks = new List<Task>();
        tasks.Add(ReadAsync());
        Task.WaitAll(tasks.ToArray());
    }

    async Task ReadAsync() {
        using (dbContext = new DatabaseContext())
        {
            var records = await dbContext.Where(r => r.Id = 100).ToListAsync();
            //do long cpu process here...
        }
    }
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Relatório
Responde à pergunta
Encontrar trabalhos remotos

Descubra a nova forma de encontrar um emprego!

melhores empregos
Principais categorias de trabalho
Empresas
Postar vaga Preços Comercial
Jurídico
Termos e Condições Política de privacidade
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomende algumas ofertas para mim
Preciso de ajuda