Empresas
Empregos
  • Sobre nós
  • Soluções
    • Publicação de vagas
      Publique sua vaga e receba candidatos qualificados em 48h.
    • Avaliações de candidatos
      Mais de 500 testes técnicos e psicológicos, mais anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Busca executiva personalizada do início ao fim.
    • Folha de Pagamento + EOR
      Dispersão de folha e EOR em mais de 15 países da LATAM.
  • Preços
  • Empregos

0

166
Visualizações
Avoiding ambiguous mustaches from Jinja2 that includes jQuery templates

I'm trying to insert jQuery templates into Jinja2 templates. Alas they both (in the default setup) use the mustaches {{ & }} to indicate expressions and literals, respectively.

I'm inserting my jQuery templates into HTML with script tags, like this:

<script type='text/x-jquery-template'>
    <div>The people are:
         {{ each people }} 
          ${$value}
         {{ /each }}
    </div>
</script>

If the above is in a Jinja template, however, it balks because Jinja tries to interpret each as a literal.

In the circumstances (we've lots of templates already) it isn't practical to change Jinja2's start and end delimiters for variables. Plus it's confusing, decreases interoperability, and requires extra training. It is preferable to avoid this option.

So the two alternative things I've thought of to solve this are:

  1. Jinja2 escaping each '{{' and '}}', which I'm not quite sure how to do best ("{{ "{{" }}`, perhaps, but that's verbose);

  2. More practical - perhaps ideal - would be telling Jinja2 to not parse a block of code, perhaps via a jQuery extension.

I'd be grateful for thoughts and feedback. Thank you for reading.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
2 Respostas
Responde à pergunta

0

You can use the {% raw %}{% endraw %} construct to ease your escaping woes (straight from the Jinja2 docs).

Example:

<script type='text/x-jquery-template'>
    <div>The people are:
        {% raw %}<!-- Everything in here will be left untouched by Jinja2 -->

        {{ each people }} 
          ${$value}
        {{ /each }}

        {% endraw %}
    </div>
</script>
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Relatório

0

I have found this via google while experimenting with polymer but did not like the proposed solution, so another alternative: Use filters.

In your python code define a filter:

#Filter to create curly braces
@app.template_filter('curly')
def curly(value):
    #Handle value as string  {{'foo'|curly}}
    if(isinstance(value,str)):
        return_value = value
    #Handle value directly. {{foo|curly}}
    else:
        return_value = value._undefined_name
    return "{{" + return_value + "}}"

Then in your template you can use {{'foo'|curly}} or {{foo|curly}}

PS: If you don't use flask I think you can't use the decorator but have to register the filter explicitly instead: environment.filters['curly'] = curly.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Relatório
Responde à pergunta
Encontrar trabalhos remotos

Descubra a nova forma de encontrar um emprego!

melhores empregos
Principais categorias de trabalho
Empresas
Postar vaga Preços Comercial
Jurídico
Termos e Condições Política de privacidade
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomende algumas ofertas para mim
Preciso de ajuda