Empresas
Empregos
  • Sobre nós
  • Soluções
    • Publicação de vagas
      Publique sua vaga e receba candidatos qualificados em 48h.
    • Avaliações de candidatos
      Mais de 500 testes técnicos e psicológicos, mais anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Busca executiva personalizada do início ao fim.
    • Folha de Pagamento + EOR
      Dispersão de folha e EOR em mais de 15 países da LATAM.
  • Preços
  • Empregos

0

434
Visualizações
#if canImport() does not find frameworks with CocoaPods

Hello here is our Podspec which has a default_subspec and an optional subspec (which won't be taken since the default is already set). That subspec has more features, but takes an additional 8MB of size...

`s.default_subspec = 'mainSDK'

s.subspec 'mainSDK' do |mainSDK|
mainSDK.vendored_frameworks = 'mainSDK.framework'
mainSDK.source_files = "mainSDK.framework/Headers/*.h"
end

s.subspec 'additionalSDK' do |additionalSDK|
additionalSDK.source_files = "additionalSDK.framework/Headers/*.h"
additionalSDK.vendored_frameworks =['additionalSDK.framework', 'mainSDK.framework']
end

Now, in our mainSDK we include additionalSDK with #if canImport(additionalSDK) We then provide code related to additionalSDK in between those compiler flags, like this:

#if canImport(additionalSDK)
    //adding optional delegate
    class ViewController: UIViewController, OptionalDelagate
#else
    //no need for delagete
    class ViewController: UIViewController
#endif

However, after client integrates our mainSDK he sees that this framework is missing module: additionalSDK.framework

How is this possible? We have marked additionalSDK as optional in our workspace. We have tried to set additionalSDK as a -weak_framework in other linker flags(Build settings) , but this did not helped.

If client integrates additionalSDK everything works well, because all frameworks are linked..

​ Optional dependencies, without CocoaPods work well, it is just problem of CocoaPods or I don't know how to configure it

s.platform = :ios
s.ios.deployment_target = '9.0'
s.name = "mainSDK"
s.summary = "mainSDK IOS SDK"
s.requires_arc = true

# 2
s.version = "1.0.8.6.5"

s.source = { :http => "https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/zipOfSDK.zip"}
s.framework = "UIKit"

s.source_files = "mainSDK.framework/Headers/*.h"

s.default_subspec = 'mainSDK'

s.subspec 'mainSDK' do |mainSDK|
mainSDK.vendored_frameworks = 'mainSDK.framework'
mainSDK.source_files = "mainSDK.framework/Headers/*.h"
end

s.subspec 'additionalSDK' do |additionalSDK|
additionalSDK.source_files = "additionalSDK.framework/Headers/*.h"
additionalSDK.vendored_frameworks =['additionalSDK.framework', 'mainSDK.framework']
end

s.swift_version = "4.2"

end

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
2 Respostas
Responde à pergunta

0

Short answer: Using #if canImport(Module) would not allow you to achieve what you described in a closed source setup. I see some misunderstanding of how this conditional compilation works.

What I mean is that you've already built a framework. Seems that #if canImport is resolved at a compile time, so it is not dynamic.

When you use already prebuilt mainSDK.framework, the part #if canImport(additionalSDK) was already evaluated. And the result depends on the availability of 'additionalSDK' in the build chain, when it was built (so on your machine when you prepare it for shipping to clients), not when it is linked.

I found someone struggling with a similar issue here: https://flint.tools/blog/finding-a-weak-linking-solution.html

The good news is, that what you want to achieve is possible using weak linking and objective-C interoperability.

I'm working on a short article about the topic, in the meantime, here is an example repository with a working setup, similar to what you described as requirements:

https://github.com/amichnia/Swift-framework-with-optional-frameworks

It supports:

  • AdditionalSDK is optional
  • MainSDK have classes adopting AdditionalSDK's protocols
  • MainSDK knows if additional features are available
  • It is all in closed source setup

Update:

I finished an article, which should describe the solution in more details. It is available at https://medium.com/@amichnia_31596/create-a-mostly-swift-framework-with-optional-features-7e8a9ac960f9

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Relatório

0

Can't achieve that by saying that mainSDK is MainTarget and additionalSDK is your AdditionalTarget? What I see is that whatever version you want differently it will be just another target. You can right-click on the original target, select duplicate from the current target and after it you can make the changes you wish to linking frameworks within the Build Phases section.

#check1: check you have use_frameworks! uncommented like this:

# Uncomment this line if you're using Swift
use_frameworks!

#check2: try to delete the ModuleCache if you really think the Framework is there and in the right path. To delete ModuleCache just delete ~/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/ModuleCache directory, clean the project and delete project-specific derived data just to be sure. When you do the normal cleanup, the ModuleCache directory usually doesn't get rebuilt.

#check3: inspect your framework to see if it contains a Modules folder with a module.modulemap file inside it (right click on your framework > Show In Finder > make sure your modulemap is there)

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Relatório
Responde à pergunta
Encontrar trabalhos remotos

Descubra a nova forma de encontrar um emprego!

melhores empregos
Principais categorias de trabalho
Empresas
Postar vaga Preços Comercial
Jurídico
Termos e Condições Política de privacidade
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomende algumas ofertas para mim
Preciso de ajuda