Empresas
Empregos
  • Sobre nós
  • Soluções
    • Publicação de vagas
      Publique sua vaga e receba candidatos qualificados em 48h.
    • Avaliações de candidatos
      Mais de 500 testes técnicos e psicológicos, mais anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Busca executiva personalizada do início ao fim.
    • Folha de Pagamento + EOR
      Dispersão de folha e EOR em mais de 15 países da LATAM.
  • Preços
  • Empregos

0

347
Visualizações
Inheriting from a namedtuple base class

This question is asking the opposite of Inherit namedtuple from a base class in python , where the aim is to inherit a subclass from a namedtuple and not vice versa.

In normal inheritance, this works:

class Y(object):
    def __init__(self, a, b, c):
        self.a = a
        self.b = b
        self.c = c


class Z(Y):
    def __init__(self, a, b, c, d):
        super(Z, self).__init__(a, b, c)
        self.d = d

[out]:

>>> Z(1,2,3,4)
<__main__.Z object at 0x10fcad950>

But if the baseclass is a namedtuple:

from collections import namedtuple

X = namedtuple('X', 'a b c')

class Z(X):
    def __init__(self, a, b, c, d):
        super(Z, self).__init__(a, b, c)
        self.d = d

[out]:

>>> Z(1,2,3,4)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: __new__() takes exactly 4 arguments (5 given)

The question, is it possible to inherit namedtuples as a base class in Python? Is so, how?

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
3 Respostas
Responde à pergunta

0

You can, but you have to override __new__ which is called implicitly before __init__:

class Z(X):
  def __new__(cls, a, b, c, d):
    self = super(Z, cls).__new__(cls, a, b, c)
    self.d = d
    return self

>>> z = Z(1, 2, 3, 4)
>>> z
Z(a=1, b=2, c=3)
>>> z.d
4

But d will be just an independent attribute!

>>> list(z)
[1, 2, 3]
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Relatório

0

I think you can achieve what you want by including all of the fields in the original named tuple, then adjusting the number of arguments using __new__ as schwobaseggl suggests above. For instance, to address max's case, where some of the input values are to be calculated rather than supplied directly, the following works:

from collections import namedtuple

class A(namedtuple('A', 'a b c computed_value')):
    def __new__(cls, a, b, c):
        computed_value = (a + b + c)
        return super(A, cls).__new__(cls, a, b, c, computed_value)

>>> A(1,2,3)
A(a=1, b=2, c=3, computed_value=6)
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Relatório

0

I came here with the exact same problem, just two years later.
I personally thought that the @property decorator would fit in here better:

from collections import namedtuple

class Base:
    @property
    def computed_value(self):
        return self.a + self.b + self.c

# inherits from Base
class A(Base, namedtuple('A', 'a b c')):
    pass

cls = A(1, 2, 3)
print(cls.computed_value)
# 6
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Relatório
Responde à pergunta
Encontrar trabalhos remotos

Descubra a nova forma de encontrar um emprego!

melhores empregos
Principais categorias de trabalho
Empresas
Postar vaga Preços Comercial
Jurídico
Termos e Condições Política de privacidade
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomende algumas ofertas para mim
Preciso de ajuda