Empresas
Empregos
  • Sobre nós
  • Soluções
    • Publicação de vagas
      Publique sua vaga e receba candidatos qualificados em 48h.
    • Avaliações de candidatos
      Mais de 500 testes técnicos e psicológicos, mais anti-fraude.
    • Headhunting
      Busca executiva personalizada do início ao fim.
    • Folha de Pagamento + EOR
      Dispersão de folha e EOR em mais de 15 países da LATAM.
  • Preços
  • Empregos

0

242
Visualizações
What should be the "Secret" in JWT?

I am going to apply JWT into my REST API developed using Java-Jersey. I am using this library for JWT - https://github.com/auth0/java-jwt

I have few questions about the JWT - Secret

  1. Does this Secret has to be unique?
  2. Shall I use the hashed version of user's password for secret? (Then it is not unique anyway) This is because then when user changed his password, his token will be automatically invalid.
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
3 Respostas
Responde à pergunta

0

  1. Does this Secret has to be unique?

It should be unique to your application — it needs to be a secret, after all — but it won't be unique for each token. Rather, you should have a relatively small number of secret keys at any given time (e.g., usually having just one key, but having brief periods where you have two keys as you rotate from one to the next).

  1. Shall I use the hashed version of user's password for secret?

No, for two reasons:

  1. Suppose that your user has a relatively insecure password, like GoPackers123. Using the password in your secret then means that someone can easily test a given potential password to see if it results in the right signature; and, more to the point, they can easily test huge numbers of potential passwords to see if any of them gives the right signature. This is an offline attack, so you would never even know it happened.
  2. This would require you to distribute all of your users' password hashes to every system that needs to hold the secret. If you have more than a trivial number of users, this can become a pretty serious burden on your secret-distribution mechanism.
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Relatório

0

JWT and the java-jwt library support both symmetric and asymmetric algorithms for the signature:

  • If you go for symmetric algorithms such as HS256, you will have only a single key to be used to sign and verify the signature.

  • If you consider asymmetric algorithms such as RS256, you will have a private and a public key. Keep the private key safe on the server and use it to sign the token. Use the public key to verify the signature (it also can be shared with whoever needs to verify the signature).

Never ever share the key used to sign the token!

And nothing stops you from having a set of different keys for signing your tokens. In this situation, the kid header parameter can be used to indicate which key was used to sign the token. This claim is supposed to carry a key identifier and not the key itself.

Refer to this answer for more details on the kid claim.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Relatório

0

Use RSA256 i.e. a private/public key-pair (no 'secret' required). That way you can keep the private key secret and safe (it will only be used to sign the token) and you can use the public key to verify that the signature is correct.

You can give the public key to anyone or any service that needs to verify that the token's signature is correct.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Relatório
Responde à pergunta
Encontrar trabalhos remotos

Descubra a nova forma de encontrar um emprego!

melhores empregos
Principais categorias de trabalho
Empresas
Postar vaga Preços Comercial
Jurídico
Termos e Condições Política de privacidade
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Recomende algumas ofertas para mim
Preciso de ajuda