According to the explaination in the docs:
setState() does not immediately mutate this.state but creates a pending state transition. Accessing this.state after calling this method can potentially return the existing value.
There is no guarantee of synchronous operation of calls to setState and calls may be batched for performance gains.
So since setState() is asyncronous and there is no guarantee about its synchronous performance. Is there an alternative of setState() that is syncronous.
For example
//initial value of cnt:0
this.setState({cnt:this.state.cnt+1})
alert(this.state.cnt); //alert value:0
Since the alert value is previous value so what is the alternative that will give alert value:1 using setState().
There are few questions on Stackoverflow which is similar to this question but no where I am able to find the correct answer.
As you have read from the documentation, there is NO sync alternative, reason as described is performance gains.
However I presume you want to perform an action after you have changed your state, you can achieve this via:
class MyComponent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
x: 1
};
console.log('initial state', this.state);
}
updateState = () => {
console.log('changing state');
this.setState({
x: 2
},() => { console.log('new state', this.state); })
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<button onClick={this.updateState}>Change state</button>
</div>
);
}
}
ReactDOM.render(
<MyComponent />,
document.getElementById("react")
);<div id="react"></div>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react-dom.min.js"></script>You could wrap setState in a function returning a promise, and then use this function with the await keyword to cause your code to wait until the state has been applied.
Personally, I would never do this in real code, instead I would just put the code I wish to execute after the state update in the setState callback.
Nerveless, here is an example.
class MyComponent extends React.Component {
function setStateSynchronous(stateUpdate) {
return new Promise(resolve => {
this.setState(stateUpdate, () => resolve());
});
}
async function foo() {
// state.count has value of 0
await setStateSynchronous(state => ({count: state.count+1}));
// execution will only resume here once state has been applied
console.log(this.state.count); // output will be 1
}
}
In the foo function, the await keyword causes the code execution to pause until the promise returned by setStateSynchronous has been resolved, which only happens once the callback passed to setState is called, which only happens when the state has been applied. So execution only reaches the console.log call once the state update has been applied.
docs for async/await:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/async_function
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/await
If this is required I would suggest using a callback in your setState function (and I also suggest using a functional setState).
The callback will be called after the state has been updated.
For example, your example would be
//initial value of cnt:0
this.setState(
(state) => ({cnt: state.cnt+1}),
() => { alert(this.state.cnt)}
)
as per documentation here : https://facebook.github.io/react/docs/react-component.html#setstate
Note: Official docs say, "Generally we recommend using componentDidUpdate() for such logic instead."