Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

390
Views
Arrow functions and the use of parentheses () or {} or ({})

I cannot understand why in the arrow functions we do not need to wrap the literal of arrow function in the ({}) braces, instead of in this example the literal just wrapped in the single () braces. Why? I had surfed the internet to find an answer on it, but it failed.

And also why we put the arguments in double braces ({}), instead of just ()?

const FilterLink = ({ filter, children }) => (
   <NavLink
       to={filter === 'SHOW_ALL' ? '/' : `/${ filter }`}
       activeStyle={ {
       textDecoration: 'none',
           color: 'black'
       }}
   >
       {children}
   </NavLink>
)
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
2 answers
Answer question

0

Using ({}) is to destructure the arguments and => () is an implicit return equivalent to => { return ()} and ( only serves to disambiguate between the start of an object and the opening braces of a function body and would generally be used when you have a multiline return value. You could simply avoid using ( and have the NavLink in the same line as the arrow =>

const FilterLink = ({ filter, children }) => ( // <-- implicit return 
  <NavLink
    to={filter === 'SHOW_ALL' ? '/' : `/${ filter }`}
    activeStyle={ {
      textDecoration: 'none',
      color: 'black'
    }}
  >
    {children}
  </NavLink>
)

is equivalent to

const FilterLink = ({ filter, children }) => {
   return (
      <NavLink
        to={filter === 'SHOW_ALL' ? '/' : `/${ filter }`}
        activeStyle={ {
          textDecoration: 'none',
          color: 'black'
        }}
      >
        {children}
      </NavLink>
    )
}

Check this answer for more details on the usage of destructuring in ({ filter, children })

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report

0

const add = ( a, b ) => ( a + b )

Is equivalent to

const add = ( a, b ) => { return a+b; }

When you use the () after your => it just automatically returns the values inside.

Edit: you can also ommit the () entirely, thanks to Tom Fenesh

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!