Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

317
Views
Node JS Concurrency Handling Coding Interview Question

I attended a NodeJS coding interview. Got below code which executes asynchronously from different browsers(to be assumed). Our solution needs to lock the execution of function if the update by ID is same but called from different place (say browser). And then release the lock for next request's execution.

Here no changes to be made for the mentioned code below.

async function update(id, data) {
    console.log(`start --> id:${id}, data:${data}`);
    await randomDelay(); //update is happening here
    console.log(`end --> id:${id}, data:${data}`);
}

//=============================================================================
//================= Don't change anything below ===============================
//=============================================================================

//---- update() is getting called from many places ----
update(1, "browser 1");
update(1, "browser 2");

//========================= Utility functions ===================================
//========================= Don't change any here================================

async function sleep(ms) {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
        setTimeout(() => resolve(), ms);
    });
}

async function randomDelay() {
    const randomTime = Math.round(Math.random() * 1000);
    return sleep(randomTime);
}

This will give an output like below.

start --> id:1, data:browser 1
start --> id:1, data:browser 2
end --> id:1, data:browser 1
end --> id:1, data:browser 2

The expected answer is

start --> id:1, data:browser 1
end --> id:1, data:browser 1
start --> id:1, data:browser 2
end --> id:1, data:browser 2

Please note the comments in code "Don't change anything below". What would be the possible solution?

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
2 answers
Answer question

0

You could use a hash table of queues keyed by ID so only jobs with the same ID run consecutively, otherwise they run concurrently.

let hash = {};
class Queue {
  constructor() {
    this.isBusy = false;
    this.jobs = [];
  }

  push(jobFn) {
    return new Promise((resolve) => {
      this.jobs.push({
        jobFn,
        resolve
      });
      this.next();
    });
  }

  next() {
    if (this.isBusy || this.jobs.length === 0) return;
    this.isBusy = true;
    let currJob = this.jobs.shift();
    return currJob.jobFn().then((data) => {
      currJob.resolve(data);
      this.isBusy = false;
      this.next();
    });
  }
}

async function update(id, data) {
  const updateFn = async () => {
    console.log(`start --> id:${id}, data:${data}`);
    await randomDelay(); //update is happening here
    console.log(`end --> id:${id}, data:${data}`);
  };
  if (id in hash) {
    hash[id].push(updateFn);
  } else {
    hash[id] = new Queue(updateFn);
    hash[id].push(updateFn);
  }
}

//=============================================================================
//================= Don't change anything below ===============================
//=============================================================================

//---- update() is getting called from many places ----
update(1, "browser 1");
update(1, "browser 2");
update(2, "browser 1");
update(2, "browser 2");
update(1, "browser 3");
update(1, "browser 4");

//========================= Utility functions ===================================
//========================= Don't change any here================================

async function sleep(ms) {
  return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    setTimeout(() => resolve(), ms);
  });
}

async function randomDelay() {
  const randomTime = Math.round(Math.random() * 1000);
  return sleep(randomTime);
}

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Report

0

This solution works for just two consecuence calls with different data as you expected, so I am working on extending it but for now, I hope will give you a good vision of how it should be implemented

const callStack = []
async function update(id, data) {
    const stackLen = callStack.length;
    let currentIndex;

    if (stackLen) {
        let currentCall = callStack[stackLen - 1];
        if (currentCall.start == true && currentCall.await == true) {
            setImmediate(() => update(id, data))
            return;
        }
        currentIndex = stackLen - 1;
        if (currentCall.args[0] == id && currentCall.args[1] !== data) {
            
            if (currentCall.await === true) {
                currentCall.start = true;
                update(id, data)
                return;
            }
        }
    } else {
        callStack.push({ args: [...arguments], await: true })
        currentIndex = 0;
    }
    console.log(`start --> id:${id}, data:${data}`);
    await randomDelay(); //update is happening here
    console.log(`end --> id:${id}, data:${data}`);
    callStack[currentIndex].await = false;
}
about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!