0
220
ViewsuseMemo vs. useEffect + useState
Are there any benefits in using useMemo (e.g. for an intensive function call) instead of using a combination of useEffect and useState?
Here are two custom hooks that work exactly the same on first sight, besides useMemo's return value being null on the first render:
useEffect & useState
import { expensiveCalculation } from "foo";
function useCalculate(someNumber: number): number {
const [result, setResult] = useState<number>(null);
useEffect(() => {
setResult(expensiveCalculation(someNumber));
}, [someNumber]);
return result;
}
useMemo
import { expensiveCalculation } from "foo";
function useCalculateWithMemo(someNumber: number): number {
return useMemo(() => {
return expensiveCalculation(someNumber);
}, [someNumber]);
};
Both calculate the result each time their parameter someNumber changes, where is the memoization of useMemo kicking in?
3 answers
Answer question0
The useEffect and setState will cause extra renders on every change: the first render will "lag behind" with stale data and then it'll immediately queue up an additional render with the new data.
Suppose we have:
// Maybe I'm running this on a literal potato
function expensiveCalculation(x) { return x + 1; };
Lets suppose someNumber is initially 0:
- The
useMemoversion immediately renders1. - The
useEffectversion rendersnull, then after the component renders the effect runs, changes the state, and queues up a new render with1.
Then if we change someNumber to 2:
- The
useMemoruns and3is rendered. - The
useEffectversion runs, and renders1again, then the effect triggers and the component reruns with the correct value of3.
In terms of how often expensiveCalculation runs, the two have identical behavior, but the useEffect version is causing twice as much rendering which is bad for performance for other reasons.
Plus, the useMemo version is just cleaner and more readable, IMO. It doesn't introduce unnecessary mutable state and has fewer moving parts.
So you're better off just using useMemo here.
0
I think there are two main points you should consider when choosing between them.
- Time when function called.
useEffect called after component has been rendered, so you can access DOM from it. For example, this is important if you want to access DOM elements via refs.
- Semantic guarantees.
useEffect guarantees that it will not be fired if dependencies have not changed. useMemo does not give such guarantees.
As stated in the React documentation, you should consider useMemo as pure optimization technique. Your program should continue to work correctly even if you replace useMemo with regular function call.
useEffect + useState can be used to control updates. Even to break-up circular dependencies and prevent infinite update loops.
0
I would say other than the async nature, there might be some difference in terms how they are designed.
useEffect is a collective call, async or not, it's collected after all components are rendered.
useMemo is a local call, which has only something to do with this component. You could just think of useMemo as another assignment statement with benefits to use the assignment from last update.
This means, useMemo is more urgent, and then useLayoutEffect and the last being useEffect.