Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

140
Views
Dynamically changing variables type

I am building a factorization program and I would like to change each BigInt type to regular Numbers when number <= Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER.

Instead of coding two functions for each case, it would be nice if I could keep it all into one function which could vary variables types accordingly (something like let myVar = 3n || 3 I guess).

function Factorize(dividend) {
  let divisor = 2n; 
  //if number <= Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER then let divisor = 2. Same for all other bigInts.
  let method1 = [], method2 = [];
  while (dividend > 1n) {
    if (dividend % divisor === 0n) {
      method1.push(`${divisor}`);
      method2.push(`${dividend} / ${divisor}`);
      dividend /= divisor;
    } else {
      divisor++
    };
  };
  return {
    default: method1,
    detailed: method2,
    get isPrime() {
      return this.default.length === 1 && this.default[0] !== 2;
    }
  };
};

const number = parseInt(prompt());

console.log(Factorize(BigInt(number)));

Thanks for your help.

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
1 answers
Answer question

0

What's the difficulty? Your comment contains half the required code already:

  if (dividend <= Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER) {
    divisor = 2;
    dividend = Number(dividend);
  }

And then you only need to replace the two strict equality comparisons === 0n and !== 2 with their non-strict variants. 0 == 0n returns true, 0n === 0n returns false.

Some other things worth mentioning:

(1) This method for factorization is extremely slow. There are prime numbers well below Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER for which this will take months. Depending on your use case, limiting the input size or implementing some sort of timeout (e.g., returning an error if a certain number of iterations wasn't enough to find the complete result) may be more important than supporting BigInts at all. (For inputs that have only small prime factors, even extremely huge inputs will still terminate quickly, so it's certainly possible to exceed Number range (even Number.MAX_VALUE) while still only taking a few milliseconds.)

(2) Using parseInt to get your input means that you're limiting yourself to Number precision; converting that Number to a BigInt afterwards doesn't bring the lost bits back. For example, if someone enters '12157665459056928801' (which is 3n ** 40n), parseInt will truncate that and your program will hence compute the wrong result. To avoid that, use the fact that the BigInt() constructor can convert strings directly, i.e.: BigInt(prompt()).

(3) While it's sometimes possible to write code that can work on both Numbers and BigInts, doing so is generally not recommended (and often not even useful), because the two types of values (intentionally!) behave differently in a number of ways (otherwise we wouldn't need both of them), so there is a large risk of such code not doing what you think it'll do. In this particular case it should be okay; I'm just advising not to generalize from this example.

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!