Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

198
Views
Logarithmic complexity: Either the book has a typo or what's happening here?

I am going through algorithms now and I've faced one example where I answered as an Infinite loop but in the correct answers, it says it's O(log2n).

function someFunc(n) {

    for(var i = 0; i < n; i * 2) { // I think that Infinite loop cannot be O(log2n), can it?
        console.log(i);
    }

}

I am a bit puzzled here. I don't understand why because it's the same as the Infinite loop below, no?

function loop(n) {

    while(true) {
        console.log(n)
    }

}

Source: Sammie Bae - JavaScript Data Structures and Algorithms - 2019 (Chapter 1)

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
1 answers
Answer question

0

This is a clear error in the book. I found a PDF of chapter 1 on the publisher's website which is exactly as you say (p.10) :

EXERCISE 5

1   function someFunction(n) {

2

3       for (var i=0;i<n;i*2) {

4           console.log(n);

5       }

6

7   }

(next page)

Answers
[...]
5. O(log2n) Logarithmic complexity. For a given n, this will operate only log2n times because i is incremented by multiplying by 2 rather than adding 1 as in the other examples.

As noted in comments, this loop will in fact never exit.

The author (probably) maintains a github repo where the source can be found, so you could propose a fix to the relevant file

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!