Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

185
Views
Fetch API vs XMLHttpRequest

I know that Fetch API uses Promises and both of them allow you to do AJAX requests to a server.

I have read that Fetch API has some extra features, which aren't available in XMLHttpRequest (and in the Fetch API polyfill, since it's based on XHR).

What extra capabilities does the Fetch API have?

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
3 answers
Answer question

0

There are a few things that you can do with fetch and not with XHR:

  • You can use the Cache API with the request and response objects;
  • You can perform no-cors requests, getting a response from a server that doesn't implement CORS. You can't access the response body directly from JavaScript, but you can use it with other APIs (e.g. the Cache API);
  • Streaming responses (with XHR the entire response is buffered in memory, with fetch you will be able to access the low-level stream). This isn't available yet in all browsers, but will be soon.

There are a couple of things that you can do with XHR that you can't do yet with fetch, but they're going to be available sooner or later (read the "Future improvements" paragraph here: https://hacks.mozilla.org/2015/03/this-api-is-so-fetching/):

  • Abort a request (this now works in Firefox and Edge, as @sideshowbarker explains in his comment);
  • Report progress.

This article https://jakearchibald.com/2015/thats-so-fetch/ contains a more detailed description.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report

0

fetch

  • missing a builtin method to consume documents
  • no way to set a timeout yet
  • can't override the content-type response header
  • if the content-length response header is present but not exposed, the body's total length is unknown during the streaming
  • will call the signal's abort handler even if the request has been completed
  • no upload progress (support for ReadableStream instances as request bodies is yet to come)
  • doesn't support --allow-file-access-from-files (chromium)

XHR

  • there's no way to not send cookies (apart from using the non-standard mozAnon flag or the AnonXMLHttpRequest constructor)
  • can't return FormData instances
  • doesn't have an equivalent to fetch's no-cors mode
  • always follow redirects
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report

0

The answers above are good and provide good insights, but I share the same opinion as shared in this google developers blog entry in that the main difference (from a practical perspective) is the convenience of the built-in promise returned from fetch

Instead of having to write code like this

function reqListener() {
    var data = JSON.parse(this.responseText);
}

function reqError(err) { ... }

var oReq = new XMLHttpRequest();
oReq.onload = reqListener;
oReq.onerror = reqError;
oReq.open('get', './api/some.json', true);
oReq.send();

we can clean things up and write something a little more concise and readable with promises and modern syntax

fetch('./api/some.json')
    .then((response) => {
        response.json().then((data) => { 
            ... 
        });
    })
    .catch((err) => { ... });
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!