Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

242
Views
loop threw an array of arrays in recursion (algorithm problem)

I kinda want to create a feature which is most often known in factories. Kind of rotation system, where people swap their station, while others are on break.

via DragnDrop I create/add/update a Map and convert this map to an array of arrays like this:

let example1 = [
    ['John',    ['99', '1']],
    ['Jo',      ["1", "3"]],
    ["Alpha",   ["99", "4"]],
    ["Beta",    ["3", "2"]],
    ["Gamma",   ["2", "99"]],
    ["Delta",   ["4", "5"]],
    ["Maria",   ["5", "6"]],
    ["Epsilon", ["6", "99"]],
];

the first number is for the old Position, the second number is for the new position. The number 99 stands for beeing on break. the output for above example should be something like:

outputExample1 = [
    ["John", "1", "3", "2"], 
    ["Alpha", "4, "5", "6"] 
]

so every sequenze and recursion should start with a breaker (=number 99) and end with a breaker. in above example: after placing "john" at station one, it should "search" where the guy/ladie from station 1 is "now". in this example, he is on 3. now search again where the one from statin 3 is now. (=2) ... until the number is 99, which is the case at this example. thats why I started to filter the original array in 'activ'(<99) and 'breakers'(==99). I tried so many ways and fail continously ( while loops ends in an endless loop, outputs which are totally wrong), because i dont find a nice recursion.

Any hints are very preciated

PS: please consider that above array is "finished" to provide a good example and may not be completed on the fly (via drag and drop). Meaning: if I start to drag the sequenze is for sure not completed.

Edit: there will be for sure at least ONE '99'. if not no sequenze and no output. Also there are no duplicates on the 'new position' except 99er. (which are the starters anyway

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
2 answers
Answer question

0

You could take a sequential approach and visit all nodes in the order, you have. Then take a nested property for the most top items and keep the relation with the nodes. At the end return just top nodes.

If necessary take the entries of the result for an array of key/value pairs.

const
    data = [['John',    ['99', '1']], ['Jo',      ["1", "3"]], ["Alpha",   ["99", "4"]], ["Beta",    ["3", "2"]], ["Gamma",   ["2", "99"]], ["Delta",   ["4", "5"]], ["Maria",   ["5", "6"]], ["Epsilon", ["6", "99"]]],
    relations = data
        .reduce((r, [top, [from, to]]) => {
            if (to === '99') return r;
            if (from === '99') {
                r[to] = r.top[top] = [to];
            } else {
                r[from].push(to);
                r[to] = r[from];
            }
            return r;
        }, { top: {} })
        .top;

console.log(relations);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }

Version without reduce.

const
    data = [['John',    ['99', '1']], ['Jo',      ["1", "3"]], ["Alpha",   ["99", "4"]], ["Beta",    ["3", "2"]], ["Gamma",   ["2", "99"]], ["Delta",   ["4", "5"]], ["Maria",   ["5", "6"]], ["Epsilon", ["6", "99"]]],
    temp = {},
    relations = {};

for (const [top, [from, to]] of data) {
    if (to === '99') continue;
    if (from === '99') {
        temp[to] = relations[top] = [to];
    } else {
        temp[from].push(to);
        temp[to] = temp[from];
    }
}

console.log(relations);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Report

0

The answer from Nina is fine, so long as your data is always sorted as in the example. If not, then this might help:

const cycleUntil = (schedule, x, [_, [f, t]] = schedule .find (([_, [f]]) => x == f)) => 
  f == 99 ? [] : [f, ... cycleUntil (schedule, t)]

const transform = (schedule) => 
  schedule .filter (([n, [f]]) => f == '99') 
           .map (([n, [f, t]]) => [n, ... cycleUntil (schedule, t)])

const example1 = [['John', ['99', '1']], ['Jo', ["1", "3"]], ["Alpha", ["99", "4"]], ["Beta", ["3", "2"]], ["Gamma", ["2", "99"]], ["Delta", ["4", "5"]], ["Maria", ["5", "6"]], ["Epsilon", ["6", "99"]] ]
console .log (transform (example1))

const example2 = [...example1, ["Zeta", ["99", "7"]], ["Eta", ["7", "10"]], ["Theta", ["8", "99"]], ["Iota", ["9", "8"]], ["Kappa", ["10", "9"]]]
console .log (transform (example2))
.as-console-wrapper {max-height: 100% !important; top: 0}

Here our transform function finds all elements that start with '99' and returns the name associated with them alongside the result of calling the cycleUntil function, which takes a station and the entire schedule and returns an array including that station, and, recursively, the element with that to station in its from position.

This will fail if the data is not constructed properly. It would almost certainly need some error-checking to ensure that the data is complete. But I'll leave that as an exercise.

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!