Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

248
Views
If a specific syntactic sugar created in a language, is it possible to take precedence over grouping operator ( ) in order of operations?

Related to:

Does the functionality of Grouping operator () in JavaScript differ from Haskell or other programming languages?

Does the Hack-style pipe operator |> take precedence over grouping operator ( ) in order of operations in JavaScript?

At least, for the latter issue, unfortunately, we still haven't reached a conclusion, therefore, I'd like to ask more generally;

If a specific syntactic sugar is created in a language, is it possible to take precedence over grouping operator ( ) in order of operations?

In the more specific issue, there is a JavaScript TC39 proposal/ hack-pipeline-operator, and the spec claims:

enter image description here

and for the functionality,

https://stackoverflow.com/a/69429001/10638454

lhs |> rhs

is syntactic sugar for

(% => rhs)(lhs)
about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!