After having a long difficult coding challenge, there was a problem that bugged me. I thought about it for an adequate time but couldn't find the way to solve it. Here, I am providing a problem and example below.
v is an array and q is a commands that does different thing according to its nested element.
if first element of nested array is 1 => second and third element of the nested array becomes the index and it returns sum[second:third+1] (As you can see, it is inclusive)
if first element of nested array is 2 => element of second index becomes the third. same as v[second] = third
With a provided example, it goes like
[1,2,4] => first element is 1. it should return sum from v[2] to v[4] (inclusive) => 12.[2,3,8] => first element is 2. it switches v[3] to 8. (now v is [1,2,3,8,5])[1,2,4] => first element is 1. it should return sum from v[2] to v[4] (inclusive) => 16, as the third index has been changed from the previous command.So the final answer is [12, 16]
The code below is how I solved, however, this is O(n**2) complexity. I wonder how I can reduce the time complexity in this case.
I tried making a hash object, but it didn't work. I can't think of a good way to make a cache in this case.
function solution(v, q) {
let answer = [];
for (let i = 0; i < q.length; i++) {
let [a, b, c] = q[i];
if (a === 1) {
let sum = 0;
for (let i = b; i <= c; i++) {
sum += v[i];
}
answer.push(sum);
} else if (a === 2) {
v[b] = c;
}
}
return answer;
}
This type of problem can typically be solved more efficiently with a Fenwick tree
Here is an implementation:
class BinaryIndexedTree extends Array {
constructor(length) {
super(length + 1);
this.fill(0);
}
add(i, delta) {
i++; // make index 1-based
while (i < this.length) {
this[i] += delta;
i += i & -i; // add least significant bit
}
}
sumUntil(i) {
i++; // make index 1-based
let sum = 0;
while (i) {
sum += this[i];
i -= i & -i;
}
return sum;
}
}
function solution(values, queries) {
const tree = new BinaryIndexedTree(values.length);
values.forEach((value, i) => tree.add(i, value));
const answer = [];
for (const [a, b, c] of queries) {
if (a === 1) {
answer.push(tree.sumUntil(c) - tree.sumUntil(b - 1));
} else {
tree.add(b, c - values[b]);
values[b] = c;
}
}
return answer;
}
let answer = solution([1,2,3,4,5], [[1,2,4], [2,3,8], [1,2,4]]);
console.log(answer);The time complexity of running tree.add or tree.sumUntil once is O(log๐), where ๐ is the size of the input values (values.length). So this is also the time complexity of running one query.
values costs O(๐log๐), as really each value in the input acts as a query that updates a value from 0 to the actual value.queries.length)So in total, we have a time complexity of O(๐ + ๐log๐ + ๐log๐) = O((๐+๐)log๐)
For more information on Fenwick trees, see BIT: What is the intuition behind a binary indexed tree and how was it thought about?