Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

428
Views
The controller is not available at localhost JBOSS.7.1.1.FINAL

When i run the jboss-cli.sh, I get this message.

[root bin]# sh jboss-cli.sh 
You are disconnected at the moment. Type 'connect' to connect to the server or 'help' for the list of supported commands.
[disconnected /] connect localhost
The controller is not available at localhost:9999
[disconnected /] connect
The controller is not available at localhost:9999
[disconnected /] connect localhost:9999  
The controller is not available at localhost:9999
[disconnected /] 

Also i have another installation of jboss5 GA. I hope that is not interfering. Although that is totally shut down for now.

Native management interface is :9999 in standalone.sh

Please throw light on this issue.

#
                                     EDITED 
#

When i stop my service with "service jboss stop" i get this message

[root@ bin]# *** JBossAS process (7302) received KILL signal ***
grep: /var/run/jboss-as/jboss-as-standalone.pid: No such file or directory

I Dont know how to check whether server is listening on the port 9999 or not.

Few more details

[root bin]# netstat -anp |grep 9999
tcp        0      0 127.0.0.1:9999              0.0.0.0:*                   LISTEN      7931/java

[root bin]# netstat -anp |grep 8080
tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:8080                0.0.0.0:*                   LISTEN      7931/java 

JBoss processs id and the server id acquiring these ports is same.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
3 answers
Answer question

0

This question has two issues ,

First, i have provided debuging parameter in the startup script. If you see 8787 that means you have somewhere provided debuging argument.

Second and the most important one controller not available @localhost or @IPADDRESS .

  1. Please check if you have used port offset, as it increments all the ports by the number with with you have set port offset. Suppose port offset is 2 Then try to access connect localhost:10001 Port i.e 9999+2

  2. On my production server sometimes it does not works with localhost , but works with IP address. Then try to access connect IPADDRESS:9999 OR Then try to access connect 127.0.0.1:9999

  3. Please check in the firewall weather the port 9999 or what ever with port offset, if the port is not open in the firewall it gives error,

I asked this question 6 months back and the above checks has solved the problem always.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report

0

This is probaby because you have changed your binding configuration and jboss does not bind to 127.0.0.1.

In case your jboss instance is not binding to 127.0.0.1, you may use --controller option as follows:

./jboss-cli.sh --controller=YOUR_IP:9999
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report

0

Use netstat -anp |grep 9999 to find out if port 9999 is in use and by which process id. You could also check the host.xml used by the controller to configure the proper native port.

In the host xml, you should find the default port:

    <native-interface security-realm="ManagementRealm">
        <socket interface="management" port="${jboss.management.native.port:9999}"/>

./jboss-cli.sh --controller=localhost:9999 --connect
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!