Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

151
Views
Why does this statement does not throw an error?

We all know that JavaScript reserved keywords cannot be used as variable names. For example, var, function, let, etc are considered special keywords in JavaScript. But consider this code:

var let = "Hi";
console.log(let); // prints out "Hi"
let var = "Hi";
console.log(var); // Syntax error

I am confused as to why the browser did not throw an error when I attempted to use it as variable name, but when I tried with var, it throws an error.

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
1 answers
Answer question

0

const and let are recent additions to JS, but for a long time before they were added const was a reserved keyword (presumably on the basis that it was thought to be a likely future addition to the language).

Since let used to be a valid variable name, this is presumably for backwards compatibility.

var let is ok but let let isn't?

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!