Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

183
Views
Is there a better alternative to setTimeOut(fn, 0)?

Is there another way of achieving the same behavior of scheduling a callback function on the JavaScript's message queue to be run after the current stack is empty?

In other words, is there a way, be it with Promises or third-party packages to push a callback to the task queue so that it runs after the current stack is empty?

In other words, what are some equivalents/alternatives to passing 0 to setTimeout to take advantage of the asynchronous callback?

Answers for all environments and all ECMAScript versions are welcome.

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
1 answers
Answer question

0

In nodejs environment, you can do the async tasks in the following way.

Ref. https://nodejs.org/en/docs/guides/event-loop-timers-and-nexttick/

setImmediate(() => console.log("setImmediate"));
setTimeout(() => console.log("setTimeout"));
Promise.resolve().then(() => console.log("Promise"));
process.nextTick(() => console.log("nextTick"));
console.log("sync");

Output:

sync
nextTick
Promise
setTimeout
setImmediate

In modern browswer, you can do the async tasks in the following way.

setTimeout(() => console.log("setTimeout"));
Promise.resolve().then(() => console.log("Promise"));
console.log("sync");

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!