Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

777
Views
Moq ReturnsAsync() with parameters

I'm trying to mock a repository's method like that

public async Task<WhitelistItem> GetByTypeValue(WhitelistType type, string value)

using Moq ReturnsAsync, like this:

static List<WhitelistItem> whitelist = new List<WhitelistItem>();

var whitelistRepositoryMock = new Mock<IWhitelistRepository>();

whitelistRepositoryMock.Setup(w => w.GetByTypeValue(It.IsAny<WhitelistType>(), It.IsAny<string>()))
                                    .ReturnsAsync((WhitelistType type, string value) =>
                                    {
                                        return (from  item in whitelist
                                                where item.Type == type && item.Value == value
                                                select item).FirstOrDefault();
                                    });

but i'm getting this error in the line "... ReturnsAsync((WhitelistType type...):

Cannot convert lambda expression to type 'Model.WhitelistItem' because it is not a delegate type

WhitelistType is an Enum like that:

public enum WhitelistType
    {
        UserName,
        PostalCode
    }

I searched by hours and didn't found any answer to my problem.

Any clues?

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
2 answers
Answer question

0

From Moq v4.5.28 onwards

You can use ReturnsAsync with lambdas, exactly as in the code example of the question. No need to use Task.FromResult() any more. You just need to specify the types of the lambda delegate arguments. Otherwise you will get the same error message:

Cannot convert lambda expression to type 'Model.WhitelistItem' because it is not a delegate type

To give an example, the following works with the latest version of Moq:

whitelistRepositoryMock.Setup(w => w.GetByTypeValue(It.IsAny<WhitelistType>(), It.IsAny<string>()))
                                .ReturnsAsync((WhitelistType type, string value) =>
                                {
                                    return (from  item in whitelist
                                            where item.Type == type && item.Value == value
                                            select item).FirstOrDefault();
                                });

Before Moq v4.5.28 (answer provided by Alexei Levenkov)

You have to use Returns with Task.FromResult:

.Returns((WhitelistType type, string value) =>
 {
     return Task.FromResult(
       (from  item in whitelist
           where item.Type == type && item.Value == value
           select item).FirstOrDefault()
       );
});
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report

0

I know this is an old question, but the one answer given here did not work for me and I was able to figure it out. It seems that you have to include the mocked function's argument types as type parameters to ReturnsAsync() first, followed by the mocked class type, and then the return type.

For example: .ReturnsAsync<T1, T2, TMock, TResult>((arg1, arg2) => { ... } )

Where T1, T2 are the types of your mocked function's arguments, and (arg1, arg2) are the actual arguments given when the mock was called.

So given the code from the OP, it would look like this:

whitelistRepositoryMock.Setup(w => w.GetByTypeValue(It.IsAny<WhitelistType>(), It.IsAny<string>()))
                       .ReturnsAsync<WhitelistType, string, IWhiteListRepository, WhitelistItem>((type, value) =>
                       {
                            return (from  item in whitelist
                                    where item.Type == type && item.Value == value
                                    select item).FirstOrDefault();
                       });

Edit: I realized later in the previous answer that the types are given in the lambda which does work. If you leave out the types, like I did, it will not. You would have to use the form I used.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!