Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

292
Views
Child process starts after parent process

I have a simple code to test the fork() function.

    #include<stdio.h>
    #include<unistd.h>
    #define MAX_COUNT 10
    void main(void)
    {
        pid_t pid;
        int i;
        fork();
        pid = getpid();
        for(i = 1; i <= MAX_COUNT; i++)
        {
            printf("PID = %d, i = %d\n", pid, i);
        }
    }

It didn't work as I expected.

My expectation is: parent's result and child's result appear alternately. Can someone explain this and teach me how to fix it? Thanks!

    PID = 3663, i = 1
    PID = 3663, i = 2
    PID = 3663, i = 3
    PID = 3663, i = 4
    PID = 3663, i = 5
    PID = 3663, i = 6
    PID = 3663, i = 7
    PID = 3663, i = 8
    PID = 3663, i = 9
    PID = 3663, i = 10
    PID = 3664, i = 1
    PID = 3664, i = 2
    PID = 3664, i = 3
    PID = 3664, i = 4
    PID = 3664, i = 5
    PID = 3664, i = 6
    PID = 3664, i = 7
    PID = 3664, i = 8
    PID = 3664, i = 9
    PID = 3664, i = 10
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
2 answers
Answer question

0

The explanation is simple. Scheduling of processes is up to the kernel. If this is a single core processor then in this run it decided to suspend the child execution and allow the parent process to run first. The parent ran for a few loops before being suspended in favor of the child, and so forth.
In a multiprocessor system both process can run in tandem but the console device will alternate the output depending on timing of interrupts.

There is no assurance a different run will result in the same output. There is also no assurance that different kernel version won't do something else.

If you want the processes to alternate between loops now is the time to learn interprocess communication.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report

0

The main process isn't giving up control immediately, and the for loop executes so fast that it is done before the second process gets scheduled. When I execute your code I get non-sequential prints, but the behavior is system dependent.

It sometimes helps to throw sleep() commands around when you're playing with fork(). Try this code...

#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

#define MAX_COUNT 10
int main(void)
{
  pid_t pid;
  int i;
  fork();

  pid = getpid();

  srand(pid); // Make sure each process has a different seed

  for(i = 1; i <= MAX_COUNT; i++)
  {
    printf("PID = %d, i = %d\n", pid, i);

    // Sleep 1-3 seconds.
    unsigned int sleep_seconds = rand() % 3 + 1;
    sleep(sleep_seconds);
  }
}
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!