Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

233
Views
Is mmap + madvise really a form of async I/O?

I'm trying to figure out if mmap'ing a file, and then using madvise() or posix_madvise() with MADV_WILLNEED/POSIX_MADV_WILLNEED actually triggers background async I/O for read-ahead. The man pages for madvise don't specify whether this is the case - the actual behavior of madvise is left mostly unclear, in order to allow for flexibility of the implementation.

But does any actual mainstream POSIX implementation (like Linux) actually perform async file I/O when madvise() with MADV_WILLNEED is called? I can't seem to get any reliable information about this. This question suggests it does, on Linux at least, even if it is not ideal since there is no callback mechanism.

This book excerpt claims that posix_fadvise with POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED will do asynchronous read ahead, but doesn't mention if madvise() does async read ahead.

Furthermore, it would seem that the whole concept of "read-ahead" I/O doesn't really make any sense unless it's asynchronous. If it was synchronous, it simply makes the user application block for the read-ahead, instead of later when actually reading the file, which doesn't seem like a particularly powerful optimization.

So, does madvise() with MADV_WILLNEED actually do async read-ahead on any mainstream platform (like Linux)?

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
2 answers
Answer question

0

With Linux you can always check the source code.

See fadvise.c:

case POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED:
    ...
    force_page_cache_readahead(mapping, f.file, start_index,
                   nrpages);
    break;

So posix_fadvise calls force_page_cache_readahead to perform readahead.

Now lets look at madvise.c:

static long madvise_willneed(...)
{
    ...
    force_page_cache_readahead(file->f_mapping, file, start, end-start);
    return 0;
}

So MADV_WILLNEED and POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED are equivalent on Linux.

Can this be called asynchronous I/O? I don't think so. Async IO usually implies there is some notification that allows you to retrieve data. Advise is just an advise: not only you do not know when data is ready to be read, but if you are too late, data might be thrown away already.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report

0

In general, you should assume that the m* functions won't perform async readahead.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!