Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

234
Views
Why is the address of __libc_start_main always the same inside GDB even though ASLR is on?
Breakpoint 1, 0x00007ffff7de8060 in __libc_start_main () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) r
The program being debugged has been started already.
Start it from the beginning? (y or n) y
Starting program: /home/firstlove/projects/org-ioslide/example/a.out 

Breakpoint 1, 0x00007ffff7de8060 in __libc_start_main () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) r
The program being debugged has been started already.
Start it from the beginning? (y or n) y
Starting program: /home/firstlove/projects/org-ioslide/example/a.out 

Breakpoint 1, 0x00007ffff7de8060 in __libc_start_main () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) Quit
(gdb) quit
A debugging session is active.

        Inferior 1 [process 16372] will be killed.

Quit anyway? (y or n) y
firstlove-pc% cat /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space
2

IIUC, ASLR should randomize all address, including the one of libc.so, but I found that the address of __libc_start_main() is always 0x00007ffff7de8060 on my Linux machine, why? What is wrong?

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
1 answers
Answer question

0

When you run a program inside gdb, gdb tries to help you debugging by disabling address randomization. You can use the following command to enable it (effective from the next run of the program):

set disable-randomization off
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!