Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

182
Views
How to optimize reading a list of files and storing them in a database?

I was recently asked a question in an interview and it really got me thinking.

I am trying to understand and learn more about multithreading, parallelism and concurrency, and performance.

The scenario is that you have a list of file paths. Files are saved on your HDD or on blob storage. You have read the files and store them in a database. How would you do it in the most optimal manner?

The following are some of the ways that I could think of:

The simplest way is to loop through the list and perform this task sequentially.

Foreach(var filePath in filePaths)
{
  ProcessFile(filePath);
}

public void ProcessFile(string filePath)
{
  var file = readFile(filePath);
  storeInDb(file);
}

2nd way I could think of is creating multiple threads perhaps:

Foreach(var filePath in filePaths)
{
Thread t  = new Thread(ProcessFIle(filePath));
t.Start();
}

(not sure if the above code is correct.)

3rd way is using async await

List<Tasks> listOfTasks;
Foreach(var filePath in filePaths)
{
  var task = ProcessFile(filePath);
  listOfTasks.Add(task);
}
Task.WhenAll(listOftasks);

public async void ProcessFile(string filePath)
{
  var file = readFile(filePath);
  storeInDb(file);
}

4th way is Parallel.For:

Parallel.For(0,filePaths.Count , new ParallelOptions { MaxDegreeOfParallelism = 10 }, i =>
    {
        ProcessFile(filePaths[i]);
    });

What are the differences between them. Which one would be better suited for the job and is there anything better?

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
2 answers
Answer question

0

You could also use Microsoft's Reactive Framework (aka Rx) - NuGet System.Reactive and add using System.Reactive.Linq; - then you can do this:

IObservable<string> query =
    from filePath in filePaths.ToObservable()
    from file in Observable.Start(() => ReadFile(filePath))
    from db in Observable.Start(() => StoreInDb(file))
    select filePath;

IDisposable subscription =
    query
        .Subscribe(
            filePath => Console.WriteLine($"{filePath} Processed."),
            () => Console.WriteLine("Done."));
over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report

0

I wrote a simple extension method to help start async tasks, limit the amount of concurrency, and wait for them all to complete;

public static async Task WhenAll(this IEnumerable<Task> tasks, int batchSize)
{
    var started = new List<Task>();

    foreach(var t in tasks)
    {
        started.Add(t);
        if (started.Count >= batchSize)
        {
            var ended = await Task.WhenAny(started);
            started.Remove(ended);
        }
    }
    await Task.WhenAll(started);
}

Then you'd want a method to stream the file contents directly into the database. For example;

async Task Process(string filename){
    using var stream = File.OpenRead(filename)

    // TODO connect to the database
    var sqlCommand = ...;
    sqlCommand.CommandText = "update [table] set [column] = @stream";
    sqlCommand.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@stream", SqlDbType.VarBinary)
    {
        Value = stream
    });
    await sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQueryAsync();
}
IEnumerable<string> files = ...;
await files.Select(f => Process(f)).WhenAll(20);

Is this the best approach? Probably not. Since it's too easy to misuse this extension. Accidently starting tasks multiple times, or starting them all at once.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!