Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

165
Views
What is the difference between RxJava 2 Cancellable and Disposable?

I want to create an Observable from view click listener using RxJava 2. I started from the simplest implementation (I don't use lambdas here to show you different types in this method):

 Observable<View> viewObservable = Observable.create(new ObservableOnSubscribe<View>() {
        @Override
        public void subscribe(@NonNull ObservableEmitter<View> e) throws Exception {
            mNewWordView.setOnClickListener(new View.OnClickListener() {
                @Override
                public void onClick(View value) {
                    if (!e.isDisposed()) {
                        e.onNext(value);
                    }
                }
            });
        }
    });

Then I thought about the way to set onClickListener to null if it is not needed further. I found that there are two methods with similar (as for me) names:

e.setCancellable(Cancellable c); and e.setDisposable(Disposable d);

What is the difference between them and which should I use?

about 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
2 answers
Answer question

0

From the Javadoc:

[Cancellable is] A functional interface that has a single cancel method that can throw.

The Disposable is not a functional interface plus when implementing its dispose() method, you are not allowed to throw checked exceptions.

In contrast, many non-RxJava components return a Closeable or AutoCloseable which are defined via throws IOException and throws Exception and are somewhat of a burden because you'd need try-catch it.

For example, you'd want to use setCancellable when you work with a file:

Observable.create((ObservableEmitter<byte[]> e) -> {
    FileInputStream fin = new FileInputStream("raw.dat");
    e.setCancellable(fin::close);

    byte[] buffer = new byte[4096];

    for (;;) {
        int r = fin.read(buffer);
        if (r < 0) {
            break;
        }
        e.onNext(buffer);
    }
    e.onComplete();
});

and you'd use setDisposable if you use a Scheduler:

Observable.create((ObservableEmitter<Event> e) -> {
    Worker worker = Schedulers.io().createWorker();
    e.setDisposable(worker);

    eventSource.onEvent(es ->
        worker.schedule(() -> e.onNext(es))
    );
});
about 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report

0

The Cancellable ends up getting wrapped into a Disposable so the final effect is the same for either call. The difference is that Disposable has more features that you might not want to implement, so the simple Cancellable interface is there as an alternative.

If you just want to dispose something when the observable ends use Cancellable. If you have a resource that might be disposed because of some external reason you want to implement Disposable to implement the Disposable.isDisposed() method.

Do note that the methods are mutually exclusive. Only a single disposable or cancellable can be registered at once. Calling both overwrites the first one.

about 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!