Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

140
Views
Angular 4 fixture component persists in DOM during Jasmine tests

When running Jasmine in real browser I noticed that TestBed fixture component isn't destroyed in DOM and persists after tests have ended:

enter image description here

Here's a tested component:

@Component({
  selector: 'test-app',
  template: `<div>Test</div>`,
})
class Test {}

And a test (plunk).

  let component;
  let fixture;
  let element;

  beforeAll(() => {
    TestBed.resetTestEnvironment();

    TestBed.initTestEnvironment(
      BrowserDynamicTestingModule,
      platformBrowserDynamicTesting()
    );
  });

  beforeEach(() => {
    TestBed.configureTestingModule({
      declarations: [Test],
    })
    .compileComponents();

    fixture = TestBed.createComponent(Test);
    component = fixture.componentInstance;
    element = fixture.debugElement.query(By.css('div')).nativeElement;

    fixture.detectChanges();
  });

  afterEach(() => {
    fixture.destroy();
  });

  it('should compile Test', () => {
    expect(element).toBeTruthy();
  });

Why Test component instance isn't removed from DOM and how this should be fixed?

Why are fixture components added to DOM at all? Can they be detached from DOM like $rootElement in AngularJS?

about 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
3 answers
Answer question

0

Jasmine nor Angular will ever remove it automatically, maybe to help you to get more details about your test execution.

To remove it you simply use afterEach(...), like:

beforeEach(() => {
  fixture = TestBed.createComponent(MyComponent);
  comp = fixture.componentInstance;
  debugElement = fixture.debugElement;
  element = debugElement.nativeElement;
});

afterEach(() => {
  document.body.removeChild(element);
});

For none Angular users:

afterEach(() => {
    document.body.innerHTML = '';
});

Above clears all default <script> tags, but that does not matter (because they did already run, and Karma does never refresh the browser, at least not till all tests finish).

about 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report

0

A more concise solution:

afterEach(() => {
  element.remove()
});

Where element is fixture.debugElement.nativeElement

about 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report

0

Please take a look at the following issues:

1) first of all you are calling

fixture.destroy();

in afterEach, so it's called after it section. I.e. in it section fixture is still not destroyed

2) by what code do you detect that element is still present in DOM? From another point of view: why that element should be removed by jasmine/browser (what reason should make jasmine/browser)? I could suggest the following usecases:

2.1) one component is used in another one and should be created/destroyed by some change. I.e. ngIf or ngSwitchCase:

<parent-component>
    <child-component *ngIf="someChangeInComponent1"></child-component>
</parent-component>

or

<parent-component [ngSwitch]="type">
    <child-component *ngSwitchCase="'something'"></child-component>
</parent-component>

2.2) routing is changed (but it's not a subject for unit-tests AFAIK)

3) current code receives the reference to DOM element only once. Should be something like:

beforeEach(() => {
    ...
    element = ...
});

it('...', () => {
    ...
    fixture.detectChanges();
    element = ... // try to get element again <--------------------- here
})

4) if you are trying to find errors like ngOnDestroy() is defined but implements OnDestroy is not used then it's more a subject for npm run lint than for unit tests (please take a look at use-life-cycle-interface in tslint.json). After running npm run lint you'll just see:

Implement lifecycle hook interface OnDestroy for method ngOnDestroy in class ...

It's a good practice to have no errors not only for unit test but for tslint too.

about 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!