Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

207
Views
Avoiding inferring generics from multiple arguments in Typescript?

Consider this function:

function fn<T>(a: T, b: T[]): T {}

I'd like it to infer T from a, then check b against T. Instead, TS is inferring T from both a and b. E.g.:

fn(1, [1, 'str']);

This returns number | string. However, I want T to be inferred as number, so this would throw an error like "number | string isn't assignable to number". Is this possible?

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
3 answers
Answer question

0

You could provide an explicit type:

declare function fnA<T>(a: T, b: (T extends T ? T : never)[]): T
fnA<number>(1, [2, 'str'])
// Type 'string' is not assignable to type 'number'.(2322)

Or do something like:

declare function fnB<T>(a: T, b: (T extends T ? T : never)[]): T
fnB(1, [1, 'str']);
// Type 'string' is not assignable to type '1'.(2322)

This forces the compiler to have to examine the type of a to figure out the type of b.

But this seems to infer a more specific type than number, so this doesn't work:

fnB(1, [1, 2]);
// Type '2' is not assignable to type '1'.(2322)

I think this breaks some heuristics Typescript about when a type automatically widens to number or string, and when it doesn't. And it is tricky for typescript to know just how tightly to constrain that type.

It will work fine if the first argument is a wider type like number, though:

const x: number = 1
fnB(x, [1, 2]); // fine

Or you could just, again, provide the type if you don't like how it got inferred:

fnB<number>(1, [1, 2]); // fine

Playground

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Report

0

Though it's just an idea, you can maybe use HOF

declare const fn = <T,>(a: T) => (b:T): T
fn(1)([1,'str'])
// Argument of type '(string | number)[]' is not assignable to parameter of type 'number'.ts(2345)

But as @alex suggested, better to provide explicit type as long as you know it

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Report

0

There is an alternative approach:


type Primitives =
    | string
    | number
    | bigint
    | boolean
    | symbol
    | null
    | undefined

type BackwardInference<T, P=Primitives> =
    P extends any ? T extends P ? P : never : never;

declare function fn<T>(a: T, b: BackwardInference<T>[]): T

fn(1, [45]) // ok

fn('str', ['hello']) // ok

fn(42, ['str']) // expected error

Playground

Because TS infers literal type if first argument is a primitive, we can loose inference strictness a bit. It means when first will be literal 42, second argument will be expected as number and not 42

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!