Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

163
Views
Jest testing a loop with Booleans

I have the following function in Jest. I have a method called isAquatic that returns a bool depending on the animal.

        const nonAquaticAnimal = ["tiger", "cat", "lion"]
        test.each(nonAquaticAnimal)(
          '.isAquatic',
          (input, false) => {
            const animal = isAquatic(input)
            expect(animal).toBe(false);
          },
        );

I have an error that says identifier false is a reserved word and cannot be used here. How can I loop through the array and call this method which returns a boolean?

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
1 answers
Answer question

0

The array argument passed to test.each is usually a 2D array, so you can have the animal and the expected result for that animal in the nonAquaticAnimals array. And the test function would both the items in as function arguments.

You can have your test as follows:

const nonAquaticAnimals = [
  ["tiger", false],
  ["cat", false],
  ["lion", false],
];
test.each(nonAquaticAnimals)(".isAquatic", (animal, expected) => {
  expect(isAquatic(animal)).toBe(expected);
});

You can also omit the expected value from your array if you find it redundant:

const nonAquaticAnimals = ["tiger", "cat", "lion"];
test.each(nonAquaticAnimals)(".isAquatic", (animal) => {
  expect(isAquatic(animal)).toBe(false);
});
about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!