Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

285
Views
Creación de un objeto que contiene un elemento único de una matriz anidada

Tengo una matriz de objetos llamados empleados. Necesito una solución que me devuelva una lista de grupos y los respectivos empleados presentes en el grupo junto con las propiedades del grupo. El ejemplo está debajo, he usado un objeto pero el resultado también puede ser una matriz que tiene una propiedad llamada groupName dentro de un objeto. [{groupName:"developer", employees:[],...}..] Siempre que la respuesta devuelva una lista de grupos con sus correspondientes empleados.

A continuación se muestra la solución que hice, pero necesito una solución con una mejor complejidad de tiempo que sea O (n).

 const employees = [ { "name": "John Doe", "id": "1", "groups": [ { "id": "developerId", "name": "developer", "color": "#fff" }, { "id": "engineerId", "name": "engineer", "color": "#fff" } ], "groupId":["developerId", "engineerId"] }, { "name": "Jane Doe", "id": "2", "groups": [ { "id": "developerId", "name": "developer", "color": "#fff" }, { "id": "testerId", "name": "tester", "color": "#fff" } ], "groupId":["developerId", "testerId"] } ] //Solution O(m*n) let groups = {}; employees.forEach((item) => { item.groups.forEach((group) => { if (!groups[group.name]) { groups[group.name] = { employees: [item.id], ...group, }; } else { groups[group.name].employees = [...groups[group.name].employees, item.id]; } }); }); //result { "developer":{ "id":"developerId", "employee":[ "1", "2" ], "color":"#fff" }, "engineer":{ "id":"employeeId", "employee":[ "1", ], "color":"#fff" }, "tester":{ "id":"testerId", "employee":[ "2", ], "color":"#fff" } }
about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
2 answers
Answer question

0

Usando Array#reduce y Array#forEach :

 const employees = [ { "name": "John Doe", "id": "1", "groups": [ { "id": "developerId", "name": "developer", "color": "#fff" }, { "id": "engineerId", "name": "engineer", "color": "#fff" } ], "groupId": ["developerId", "engineerId"] }, { "name": "Jane Doe", "id": "2", "groups": [ { "id": "developerId", "name": "developer", "color": "#fff" }, { "id": "testerId", "name": "tester", "color": "#fff" } ], "groupId": ["developerId", "testerId"] } ]; const groups = employees.reduce((acc, { id: employeeId, groups = [] }) => { groups.forEach(({ id, name, color }) => { acc[name] = { id, color, employee: [...(acc[name]?.employee ?? []), employeeId] }; }); return acc; }, {}); console.log(groups);

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Report

0

Si desea agregar algo de velocidad, puede usar la antigua declaración for para iterar, especialmente si tiene un solo objeto de resultado.

Este enfoque no crea un objeto una y otra vez y utiliza los objetos ya existentes.

 const employees = [{ name: "John Doe", id: "1", groups: [{ id: "developerId", name: "developer", color: "#fff" }, { id: "engineerId", name: "engineer", color: "#fff" }], groupId: ["developerId", "engineerId"] }, { name: "Jane Doe", id: "2", groups: [{ id: "developerId", name: "developer", color: "#fff" }, { id: "testerId", name: "tester", color: "#fff" }], groupId: ["developerId", "testerId"] }], result = {}; for (const { id: employeeId, groups } of employees) { for (const { id, name, color } of groups) { result[name] ??= { id, color, employee: [] }; result[name].employee.push(employeeId); } } console.log(result);
 .as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!