Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

199
Views
Best practice for initializing a variable when using @Input decorator in Angular

Let's assume we have an Interface Customer:

export interface Customer {
    name: string;
    age: number;
    phone: string;
}

Now we have a parent component and we want to pass an instance of Customer to the child component:

<child-component [customer]="instanceOfCustomer"></child-component>

After that we need to use @Input decorator to get the data in the child component. (We assume passing the instance is mandatory to use this component and this component will not work without passing the instance)

@Input() customer:Customer;

The problem is that we need to initialize customer somewhere and I think there are 3 approaches to avoid the error in Typescript:

  1. Initializing an empty customer in the constructor:

    this.customer = {
        name: "";
        age: 0;
        phone: "";
    }
    
  2. Change strictPropertyInitialization to false

  3. Just adding the ! prefix (Which I think I should use because no one should use this child component without passing the relative customer)

    @Input() customer!:Customer;
    

I want to know what approach should I use to avoid property initialization error in case of using @Input decorator.

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
2 answers
Answer question

0

you should use setter https://angular.io/guide/component-interaction#intercept-input-property-changes-with-a-setter

or you can also use your 3rd approach.

there is already some answers for this too.

refer below answers for more details :

Make directive @Input required

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Report

0

To avoid TS from complaining I'll suggest initializing it like this:

@Input() customer: Customer | null = null;

Using null will stop the compiler from complaining when you pass the input through the async pipe (the async pipe returns something like T | null).

Also by doing that you'll have to make sure that you account for null values wherever you use that property, so fewer errors to deal with in production if something goes wrong let's say.

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!