Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

99
Views
Typescript instantiate string union type

So I have a string union type

type S = 'a' | 'b' | 'c';

I want to initialize a value of type S, while asserting that is of type S. With a variable, it's very easy:

const s1: S = 'a';
const s2: S = 'z'; // error

However, I just want to instantiate the value itself, along the lines of 'a' as S but checking that 'a' is of type S.

The exact use case is that I'm using a library that provides a function f(s: string), but I want to ensure that when I call it, I only call it with the strings I deem ok. Since [afaik] you can't narrow the signature from outside the library, I was thinking of doing something like f('a' as S) every time I used f.

Defining my own function g = (s: S) => f(s) isn't a great option because actually f's signature looks like f(s: string, t: T) where T is a complex, library defined type that I'm not sure is even exported.

What would be the best way to accomplish this?

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza
2 answers
Answer question

0

Wrap the external function with your own using the string type (TS playground):

const externalFn = <T>(s: string, t: T) => t

type S = 'a' | 'b' | 'c';

const yourFn = (s: S, t: Parameters<typeof externalFn>[1]) => externalFn(s, t)

If you need to handle a function with more than one argument, you can use the idea in this answer (TS playground):

type DropFirst<T extends unknown[]> = T extends [any, ...infer U] ? U : never

const externalFn = <T>(s: string, t: T) => t

type S = 'a' | 'b' | 'c';

const yourFn = (s: S, ...rest: DropFirst<Parameters<typeof externalFn>>) => externalFn(s, ...rest)
about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Report

0

I ended up making a simple wrapper function like so:

function ok<T extends string>(s: T): T {
  return s;
}

that I could then use like f(ok<S>('a')), because in my case there were multiple functions and types that I wanted to do this verification for, and making a separate wrapping function would be tedious and not maintainable.

about 4 years ago · Juan Pablo Isaza Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!